Recessions and instable estimates of potential output

This paper analyzes how the OECD revises potential output (PO) estimates after recessions. We show that downward revisions are substantial and mostly driven by supply shocks while PO estimates do not significantly react to demand shocks. In addition, revisions are partly caused by avoidable mismeasu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dovern, Jonas (Author) , Zuber, Christopher (Author)
Format: Book/Monograph Working Paper
Language:English
Published: Heidelberg University of Heidelberg November 7, 2017
Series:Discussion paper series / University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics no. 639
In: Discussion paper series (no. 639)

DOI:10.11588/heidok.00023706
Subjects:
Online Access:Resolving-System, kostenfrei, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00023706
Resolving-System, kostenfrei, Volltext: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-heidok-237060
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/md/awi/forschung/deseminar/dp__639_dovern_zuber.pdf
Resolving-System, kostenfrei, Volltext: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/179268
Get full text
Author Notes:Jonas Dovern and Christopher Zuber
Description
Summary:This paper analyzes how the OECD revises potential output (PO) estimates after recessions. We show that downward revisions are substantial and mostly driven by supply shocks while PO estimates do not significantly react to demand shocks. In addition, revisions are partly caused by avoidable mismeasurement of PO before recessions. In particular, we show that the length of the preceding boom and pre-recession values of the current account balance and credit volumes are predictors of post-recession PO revisions. Our results call for improved methods for estimating PO and provide evidence against the existence of substantial hysteresis effects of demand shocks.
Physical Description:Online Resource
DOI:10.11588/heidok.00023706