Process fairness, outcome fairness, and dynamic consistency: experimental evidence for risk and ambiguity

Literature on fairness preferences distinguishes between outcome fairness, concerning the final allocation of payoffs, and process fairness, concerning the expected allocation of payoffs. It is not obvious, however, whether process fairness can consistently be implemented. Once uncertainty is resolv...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Trautmann, Stefan T. (Author) , Kuilen, Gijs van de (Author)
Format:	Article (Journal)
Language:	English
Published:	04 February 2017
In:	Journal of risk and uncertainty Year: 2016, Volume: 53, Issue: 2/3, Pages: 75-88
ISSN:	1573-0476
DOI:	10.1007/s11166-016-9249-4
Online Access:	Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11166-016-9249-4 Verlag, Volltext: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11166-016-9249-4
Author Notes:	Stefan T. Trautmann, Gijs van de Kuilen

Process fairness, outcome fairness, and dynamic consistency: experimental evidence for risk and ambiguity by Trautmann, Stefan T. (Author) , Kuilen, Gijs van de (Author) ,

Universität February 06, 2017

Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext

Database Research Data Online Resource

Process fairness, outcome fairness, and dynamic consistency: experimental evidence for risk and ambiguity by Trautmann, Stefan T. (Author) , Kuilen, Gijs van de (Author) ,

in: Journal of risk and uncertainty, 53 (2016), 2/3 vom: Dez., Seite 75-88

Article (Journal)

Process fairness, outcome fairness, and dynamic consistency: experimental evidence for risk and ambiguity

Process fairness, outcome fairness, and dynamic consistency: experimental evidence for risk and ambiguity by Trautmann, Stefan T. (Author) , Kuilen, Gijs van de (Author) ,

Process fairness, outcome fairness, and dynamic consistency: experimental evidence for risk and ambiguity by Trautmann, Stefan T. (Author) , Kuilen, Gijs van de (Author) ,

Similar Items