Drawing the line: a comment on CDP's classification of LDCs

The paper examines the efforts of the United Nations Committee on Development Planning to redefine the concept of "Least Developed Countries", as presented in the preceding paper by Udo E. Simonis. While the endeavour to provide a rule for determining the inclusion of a given country in th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Rieger, Hans Christoph (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Freiburg Arnold-Bergstraesser-Institut für Kulturwissenschaftliche Forschung 1992
In: Internationales Asien-Forum
Year: 1992, Jahrgang: 23, Heft: 1/2, Pages: 21-26
ISSN:2365-0117
DOI:10.11588/iaf.1992.23.1670
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.11588/iaf.1992.23.1670
Verlag, Volltext: http://crossasia-journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/iaf/article/view/1670
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-iaf-16706
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Hans Christoph Rieger
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The paper examines the efforts of the United Nations Committee on Development Planning to redefine the concept of "Least Developed Countries", as presented in the preceding paper by Udo E. Simonis. While the endeavour to provide a rule for determining the inclusion of a given country in the set eligible for aid on concessional terms is laudable, a number of questions are raised regarding the indicators proposed. In particular, the paper takes issue with Simonis’ statement that underdevelopment is being newly defined.
Beschreibung:Elektronische Reproduktion der Druckausgabe
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:2365-0117
DOI:10.11588/iaf.1992.23.1670