Joint reconstruction of galaxy clusters from gravitational lensing and thermal gas: I. outline of a non-parametric method

We present a method to estimate the lensing potential from massive galaxy clusters for given observational X-ray data. The concepts developed and applied in this work can easily be combined with other techniques to infer the lensing potential, e.g. weak gravitational lensing or galaxy kinematics, to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Konrad, Sara (Author) , Majer, Charles Ludwig (Author) , Meyer, Sven (Author) , Sarli-Waizmann, Eleonora (Author) , Bartelmann, Matthias (Author)
Format: Article (Journal) Chapter/Article
Language:English
Published: 19 Apr 2013
In: Arxiv

Online Access:Verlag, Volltext: http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.5443
Get full text
Author Notes:Sara Konrad, Charles L. Majer, Sven Meyer, Eleonora Sarli, and Matthias Bartelmann
Description
Summary:We present a method to estimate the lensing potential from massive galaxy clusters for given observational X-ray data. The concepts developed and applied in this work can easily be combined with other techniques to infer the lensing potential, e.g. weak gravitational lensing or galaxy kinematics, to obtain an overall best fit model for the lensing potential. After elaborating on the physical details and assumptions the method is based on, we explain how the numerical algorithm itself is implemented with a Richardson-Lucy algorithm as a central part. Our reconstruction method is tested on simulated galaxy clusters with a spherically symmetric NFW density profile filled with gas in hydrostatic equilibrium. We describe in detail how these simulated observational data sets are created and how they need to be fed into our algorithm. We test the robustness of the algorithm against small parameter changes and estimate the quality of the reconstructed lensing potentials. As it turns out we achieve a very high degree of accuracy in reconstructing the lensing potential. The statistical errors remain below 2.0% whereas the systematical error does not exceed 1.0%.
Item Description:Gesehen am 21.09.2017
Physical Description:Online Resource