Rationality and self-interest as economic-exchange strategy in borderline personality disorder: game theory, social preferences, and interpersonal behavior

Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is characterized by severe and persistent impairments in interpersonal functioning. Given the complexity of social interactions, studying the interactive behavior of BPD patients is challenging. One way to implement both tight experimental control and realistic,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Jeung, Haang (VerfasserIn) , Schwieren, Christiane (VerfasserIn) , Herpertz, Sabine (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 5 November 2016
In: Neuroscience & biobehavioral reviews
Year: 2016, Jahrgang: 71, Pages: 849-864
ISSN:1873-7528
DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.10.030
Online-Zugang:Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.10.030
Verlag, Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014976341630152X
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Haang Jeung, Christiane Schwieren, Sabine C. Herpertz
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is characterized by severe and persistent impairments in interpersonal functioning. Given the complexity of social interactions, studying the interactive behavior of BPD patients is challenging. One way to implement both tight experimental control and realistic, externally valid settings is to use game-theoretical experiments. This review discusses findings from economic exchange studies in BPD against the background of game-theoretical literature. BPD patients do not seem to derive utility from mutual cooperation with others and appear not to “forgive” a partner’s unfairness. By pursuing a strategy of negative reciprocity, BPD patients seem to act mostly “rationally” and in their own self-interest. Their “grim trigger strategy” resembles the theoretical ideal of the rational and self-interested agent homo economicus. Finally, we summarize how research findings from economics and clinical psychiatry may be mutually enriching and propose new research ideas in this fascinating field.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 25.10.2017
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1873-7528
DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.10.030