Matter power spectrum and the challenge of percent accuracy
Future galaxy surveys require one percent precision in the theoretical knowledge of the power spectrum over a large range including very nonlinear scales. While this level of accuracy is easily obtained in the linear regime with perturbation theory, it represents a serious challenge for small scales...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) Chapter/Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2016
|
| In: |
Arxiv
|
| Online Access: | Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.05920
|
| Author Notes: | Aurel Schneider, Romain Teyssier, Doug Potter, Joachim Stadel, Julian Onions, Darren S. Reed, Robert E. Smith, Volker Springel, Frazer R. Pearce, and Roman Scoccimarro |
| Summary: | Future galaxy surveys require one percent precision in the theoretical knowledge of the power spectrum over a large range including very nonlinear scales. While this level of accuracy is easily obtained in the linear regime with perturbation theory, it represents a serious challenge for small scales where numerical simulations are required. In this paper we quantify the precision of present-day $N$-body methods, identifying main potential error sources from the set-up of initial conditions to the measurement of the final power spectrum. We directly compare three widely used $N$-body codes, Ramses, Pkdgrav3, and Gadget3 which represent three main discretisation techniques: the particle-mesh method, the tree method, and a hybrid combination of the two. For standard run parameters, the codes agree to within one percent at $k\leq1$ |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 07.11.2017 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |