Lack of “obesity paradox” in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction including cardiogenic shock: a multicenter German network registry analysis
Background: Studies have associated obesity with better outcomes in comparison to non-obese patients after elective and emergency coronary revascularization. However, these findings might have been influenced by patient selection. Therefore we thought to look into the obesity paradox in a consecutiv...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article (Journal) |
Language: | English |
Published: |
11 July 2015
|
In: |
BMC cardiovascular disorders
Year: 2015, Volume: 15 |
ISSN: | 1471-2261 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12872-015-0065-6 |
Online Access: | kostenfrei kostenfrei ![]() |
Author Notes: | Ibrahim Akin, Henrik Schneider, Christoph A. Nienaber, Werner Jung, Mike Lübke, Andreas Rillig, Uzair Ansari, Nina Wunderlich and Ralf Birkemeyer |
Summary: | Background: Studies have associated obesity with better outcomes in comparison to non-obese patients after elective and emergency coronary revascularization. However, these findings might have been influenced by patient selection. Therefore we thought to look into the obesity paradox in a consecutive network STEMI population. Methods: The database of two German myocardial infarction network registries were combined and data from a total of 890 consecutive patients admitted and treated for acute STEMI including cardiogenic shock and cardiopulmonary resuscitation according to standardized protocols were analyzed. Patients were categorized in normal weight (≤24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25-30 kg/m2) and obese (>30 kg/m2) according to BMI. Results: Baseline clinical parameters revealed a higher comorbidity index for overweight and obese patients; 1-year follow-up comparison between varying groups revealed similar rates of all-cause death (9.1 % vs. 8.3 % vs. 6.2 %; p = 0.50), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular [MACCE (15.1 % vs. 13.4 % vs. 10.2 %; p = 0.53)] and target vessel revascularization in survivors [TVR (7.0 % vs. 5.0 % vs. 4.0 %; p = 0.47)] with normal weight when compared to overweight or obese patients. These results persisted after risk-adjustment for heterogeneous baseline characteristics of groups. An analysis of patients suffering from cardiogenic shock showed no impact of BMI on clinical endpoints. Conclusion: Our data from two network systems in Germany revealed no evidence of an “obesity paradox”in an all-comer STEMI population including patients with cardiogenic shock. |
---|---|
Item Description: | Gesehen am 18.01.2018 |
Physical Description: | Online Resource |
ISSN: | 1471-2261 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12872-015-0065-6 |