Lack of “obesity paradox” in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction including cardiogenic shock: a multicenter German network registry analysis

Background: Studies have associated obesity with better outcomes in comparison to non-obese patients after elective and emergency coronary revascularization. However, these findings might have been influenced by patient selection. Therefore we thought to look into the obesity paradox in a consecutiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Akın, Ibrahim (Author) , Ansari, Uzair (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 11 July 2015
In: BMC cardiovascular disorders
Year: 2015, Volume: 15
ISSN:1471-2261
DOI:10.1186/s12872-015-0065-6
Online Access:kostenfrei
kostenfrei
Get full text
Author Notes:Ibrahim Akin, Henrik Schneider, Christoph A. Nienaber, Werner Jung, Mike Lübke, Andreas Rillig, Uzair Ansari, Nina Wunderlich and Ralf Birkemeyer
Description
Summary:Background: Studies have associated obesity with better outcomes in comparison to non-obese patients after elective and emergency coronary revascularization. However, these findings might have been influenced by patient selection. Therefore we thought to look into the obesity paradox in a consecutive network STEMI population. Methods: The database of two German myocardial infarction network registries were combined and data from a total of 890 consecutive patients admitted and treated for acute STEMI including cardiogenic shock and cardiopulmonary resuscitation according to standardized protocols were analyzed. Patients were categorized in normal weight (≤24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25-30 kg/m2) and obese (>30 kg/m2) according to BMI. Results: Baseline clinical parameters revealed a higher comorbidity index for overweight and obese patients; 1-year follow-up comparison between varying groups revealed similar rates of all-cause death (9.1 % vs. 8.3 % vs. 6.2 %; p = 0.50), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular [MACCE (15.1 % vs. 13.4 % vs. 10.2 %; p = 0.53)] and target vessel revascularization in survivors [TVR (7.0 % vs. 5.0 % vs. 4.0 %; p = 0.47)] with normal weight when compared to overweight or obese patients. These results persisted after risk-adjustment for heterogeneous baseline characteristics of groups. An analysis of patients suffering from cardiogenic shock showed no impact of BMI on clinical endpoints. Conclusion: Our data from two network systems in Germany revealed no evidence of an “obesity paradox”in an all-comer STEMI population including patients with cardiogenic shock.
Item Description:Gesehen am 18.01.2018
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1471-2261
DOI:10.1186/s12872-015-0065-6