The quality of response time data inference: a blinded, collaborative assessment of the validity of cognitive models

Most data analyses rely on models. To complement statistical models, psychologists have developed cognitive models, which translate observed variables into psychologically interesting constructs. Response time models, in particular, assume that response time and accuracy are the observed expression...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Dutilh, Gilles (VerfasserIn) , Lerche, Veronika (VerfasserIn) , Voß, Andreas (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2018
In: Psychonomic bulletin & review
Year: 2019, Jahrgang: 26, Heft: 4, Pages: 1051–1069
ISSN:1531-5320
DOI:10.3758/s13423-017-1417-2
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1417-2
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13423-017-1417-2
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Gilles Dutilh, Jeffrey Annis, Scott D. Brown, Peter Cassey, Nathan J. Evans, Raoul P. P. P. Grasman, Guy E. Hawkins, Andrew Heathcote, William R. Holmes, Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos, Colin N. Kupitz, Fábio P. Leite, Veronika Lerche, Yi-Shin Lin, Gordon D. Logan, Thomas J. Palmeri, Jeffrey J. Starns, Jennifer S. Trueblood, Leendert van Maanen, Don van Ravenzwaaij, Joachim Vandekerckhove, Ingmar Visser, Andreas Voss, Corey N. White, Thomas V. Wiecki, Jörg Rieskamp, Chris Donkin

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1571522794
003 DE-627
005 20220814102757.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180328s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3758/s13423-017-1417-2  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1571522794 
035 |a (DE-576)501522794 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ501522794 
035 |a (OCoLC)1341000655 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 11  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Dutilh, Gilles  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1155274393  |0 (DE-627)1016599196  |0 (DE-576)501523537  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The quality of response time data inference  |b a blinded, collaborative assessment of the validity of cognitive models  |c Gilles Dutilh, Jeffrey Annis, Scott D. Brown, Peter Cassey, Nathan J. Evans, Raoul P. P. P. Grasman, Guy E. Hawkins, Andrew Heathcote, William R. Holmes, Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos, Colin N. Kupitz, Fábio P. Leite, Veronika Lerche, Yi-Shin Lin, Gordon D. Logan, Thomas J. Palmeri, Jeffrey J. Starns, Jennifer S. Trueblood, Leendert van Maanen, Don van Ravenzwaaij, Joachim Vandekerckhove, Ingmar Visser, Andreas Voss, Corey N. White, Thomas V. Wiecki, Jörg Rieskamp, Chris Donkin 
264 1 |c 2018 
300 |a 19 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Published online: 15 February 2018 
500 |a Gesehen am 05.10.2020 
520 |a Most data analyses rely on models. To complement statistical models, psychologists have developed cognitive models, which translate observed variables into psychologically interesting constructs. Response time models, in particular, assume that response time and accuracy are the observed expression of latent variables including 1) ease of processing, 2) response caution, 3) response bias, and 4) non-decision time. Inferences about these psychological factors hinge upon the validity of the models’ parameters. Here, we use a blinded, collaborative approach to assess the validity of such model-based inferences. Seventeen teams of researchers analyzed the same 14 data sets. In each of these two-condition data sets, we manipulated properties of participants’ behavior in a two-alternative forced choice task. The contributing teams were blind to the manipulations, and had to infer what aspect of behavior was changed using their method of choice. The contributors chose to employ a variety of models, estimation methods, and inference procedures. Our results show that, although conclusions were similar across different methods, these "modeler’s degrees of freedom" did affect their inferences. Interestingly, many of the simpler approaches yielded as robust and accurate inferences as the more complex methods. We recommend that, in general, cognitive models become a typical analysis tool for response time data. In particular, we argue that the simpler models and procedures are sufficient for standard experimental designs. We finish by outlining situations in which more complicated models and methods may be necessary, and discuss potential pitfalls when interpreting the output from response time models. 
700 1 |a Lerche, Veronika  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1042780285  |0 (DE-627)769657605  |0 (DE-576)39421465X  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Voß, Andreas  |d 1972-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1028372574  |0 (DE-627)730618919  |0 (DE-576)375905065  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Psychonomic bulletin & review  |d New York, NY : Springer, 1994  |g 26(2019), 4, Seite 1051–1069  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)324827121  |w (DE-600)2031311-1  |w (DE-576)093983999  |x 1531-5320  |7 nnas  |a The quality of response time data inference a blinded, collaborative assessment of the validity of cognitive models 
773 1 8 |g volume:26  |g year:2019  |g number:4  |g pages:1051–1069  |g extent:19  |a The quality of response time data inference a blinded, collaborative assessment of the validity of cognitive models 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1417-2  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13423-017-1417-2  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
992 |a 20180328 
993 |a Article 
994 |a 2019 
998 |g 1028372574  |a Voß, Andreas  |m 1028372574:Voß, Andreas  |d 100000  |d 100200  |e 100000PV1028372574  |e 100200PV1028372574  |k 0/100000/  |k 1/100000/100200/  |p 23 
998 |g 1042780285  |a Lerche, Veronika  |m 1042780285:Lerche, Veronika  |d 100000  |d 100200  |e 100000PL1042780285  |e 100200PL1042780285  |k 0/100000/  |k 1/100000/100200/  |p 13 
999 |a KXP-PPN1571522794  |e 3004452995 
BIB |a Y 
SER |a journal 
JSO |a {"physDesc":[{"extent":"19 S."}],"recId":"1571522794","origin":[{"dateIssuedKey":"2019","dateIssuedDisp":"2018"}],"relHost":[{"title":[{"title_sort":"Psychonomic bulletin & review","title":"Psychonomic bulletin & review","subtitle":"a journal of the Psychonomic Society"}],"language":["eng"],"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"periodical"},"note":["Gesehen am 01.03.13"],"origin":[{"publisher":"Springer ; Psychonomic Society Publ.","dateIssuedDisp":"1994-","dateIssuedKey":"1994","publisherPlace":"New York, NY ; Austin, Tex."}],"disp":"The quality of response time data inference a blinded, collaborative assessment of the validity of cognitive modelsPsychonomic bulletin & review","recId":"324827121","physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"id":{"eki":["324827121"],"issn":["1531-5320"],"zdb":["2031311-1"]},"part":{"pages":"1051–1069","issue":"4","extent":"19","text":"26(2019), 4, Seite 1051–1069","year":"2019","volume":"26"},"titleAlt":[{"title":"PB&R"},{"title":"Psychonomic bulletin and review"}],"pubHistory":["1.1994 -"],"corporate":[{"display":"Psychonomic Society","role":"isb"}]}],"person":[{"display":"Dutilh, Gilles","family":"Dutilh","role":"aut","given":"Gilles"},{"display":"Lerche, Veronika","given":"Veronika","role":"aut","family":"Lerche"},{"display":"Voß, Andreas","given":"Andreas","role":"aut","family":"Voß"}],"type":{"bibl":"article-journal","media":"Online-Ressource"},"language":["eng"],"note":["Published online: 15 February 2018","Gesehen am 05.10.2020"],"title":[{"subtitle":"a blinded, collaborative assessment of the validity of cognitive models","title_sort":"quality of response time data inference","title":"The quality of response time data inference"}],"name":{"displayForm":["Gilles Dutilh, Jeffrey Annis, Scott D. Brown, Peter Cassey, Nathan J. Evans, Raoul P. P. P. Grasman, Guy E. Hawkins, Andrew Heathcote, William R. Holmes, Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos, Colin N. Kupitz, Fábio P. Leite, Veronika Lerche, Yi-Shin Lin, Gordon D. Logan, Thomas J. Palmeri, Jeffrey J. Starns, Jennifer S. Trueblood, Leendert van Maanen, Don van Ravenzwaaij, Joachim Vandekerckhove, Ingmar Visser, Andreas Voss, Corey N. White, Thomas V. Wiecki, Jörg Rieskamp, Chris Donkin"]},"id":{"eki":["1571522794"],"doi":["10.3758/s13423-017-1417-2"]}} 
SRT |a DUTILHGILLQUALITYOFR2018