APA (7th ed.) Citation

Helfer, A. G., & Meyer, M. R. (2017). LC-HR-MS/MS standard urine screening approach: Pros and cons of automated on-line extraction by turbulent flow chromatography versus dilute-and-shoot and comparison with established urine precipitation. Journal of chromatography, 1043, . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.06.036

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Helfer, Andreas Günter, and Markus Robert Meyer. "LC-HR-MS/MS Standard Urine Screening Approach: Pros and Cons of Automated On-line Extraction by Turbulent Flow Chromatography Versus Dilute-and-shoot and Comparison with Established Urine Precipitation." Journal of Chromatography 1043 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.06.036.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Helfer, Andreas Günter, and Markus Robert Meyer. "LC-HR-MS/MS Standard Urine Screening Approach: Pros and Cons of Automated On-line Extraction by Turbulent Flow Chromatography Versus Dilute-and-shoot and Comparison with Established Urine Precipitation." Journal of Chromatography, vol. 1043, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.06.036.