Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy
Background: The first International conference on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection was arranged in conjunction with the annual meeting of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA), in Sao Paulo, Brazil on April 19th 2016. The presented evidence and outcomes resulting from t...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) Conference Paper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
16 February 2017
|
| In: |
HPB
Year: 2017, Volume: 19, Issue: 3, Pages: 205-214 |
| ISSN: | 1477-2574 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.009 |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.009 Verlag, Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365182X17300394 
|
| Author Notes: | Bård I. Røsok, Thijs de Rooij, Jony van Hilst, Markus K. Diener, Peter J. Allen, Charles M. Vollmer, David A. Kooby, Shailesh V. Shrikhande & on behalf of the Organizing Committee for the State of the Art Conference on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection |
| Summary: | Background: The first International conference on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection was arranged in conjunction with the annual meeting of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA), in Sao Paulo, Brazil on April 19th 2016. The presented evidence and outcomes resulting from the session for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is summarized and addressed perioperative outcome, the outcome for cancer and patient selection for the procedure. Methods A literature search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to compare MIDP and open distal pancreatectomy. Patient selection was discussed based on plenary talks, panel discussions and a worldwide survey on MIDP. Results Of 582 studies, 52 (40 observational and 12 case-matched) were included in the assessment for outcome for LDP (n = 5023) vs. ODP (n = 16,306) whereas 16 observational comparative studies were identified for cancer outcome. No randomized trials were identified. MIDP resulted in similar outcome to ODP with a tendency for lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay in the MIDP group. Discussion Available evidence for comparison of MIDP to ODP is weak, although the number of studies is high. Observed outcomes of MIDP are promising. In the absence of randomized control trials, an international registry should be established. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 23.04.2018 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1477-2574 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.009 |