DeloRes trial: study protocol for a randomized trial comparing two standardized surgical approaches in rectal prolapse : Delorme’s procedure versus resection rectopexy
More than 100 surgical approaches to treat rectal prolapse have been described. These can be done through the perineum or transabdominally. Delorme’s procedure is the most frequently used perineal, resection rectopexy the most commonly used abdominal procedure. Recurrences seem more common after per...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
29 August 2012
|
| In: |
Trials
Year: 2012, Jahrgang: 13 |
| ISSN: | 1468-6694 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/1745-6215-13-155 |
| Online-Zugang: | Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-155 Verlag, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-155 |
| Verfasserangaben: | Simone Rothenhoefer, Florian Herrle, Alexander Herold, Andreas Joos, Dieter Bussen, Meinhard Kieser, Petra Schiller, Christina Klose, Christoph M. Seiler, Peter Kienle, Stefan Post |
| Zusammenfassung: | More than 100 surgical approaches to treat rectal prolapse have been described. These can be done through the perineum or transabdominally. Delorme’s procedure is the most frequently used perineal, resection rectopexy the most commonly used abdominal procedure. Recurrences seem more common after perineal compared to abdominal techniques, but the latter may carry a higher risk of peri- and postoperative morbidity and mortality. |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Gesehen am 26.04.2018 |
| Beschreibung: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1468-6694 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/1745-6215-13-155 |