Intraoperative assessment of reduction and implant placement in acetabular fractures - limitations of 3D-imaging compared to computed tomography
In acetabular fractures, the assessment of reduction and implant placement has limitations in conventional 2D intraoperative imaging. 3D imaging offers the opportunity to acquire CT-like images and thus to improve the results. However, clinical experience shows that even 3D imaging has limitations,...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
10 April 2018
|
| In: |
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
Year: 2018, Jahrgang: 13 |
| ISSN: | 1749-799X |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s13018-018-0780-7 |
| Online-Zugang: | Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0780-7 Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0780-7 |
| Verfasserangaben: | Holger Keil, Nils Beisemann, Marc Schnetzke, Sven Yves Vetter, Benedict Swartman, Paul Alfred Grützner and Jochen Franke |
| Zusammenfassung: | In acetabular fractures, the assessment of reduction and implant placement has limitations in conventional 2D intraoperative imaging. 3D imaging offers the opportunity to acquire CT-like images and thus to improve the results. However, clinical experience shows that even 3D imaging has limitations, especially regarding artifacts when implants are placed. The purpose of this study was to assess the difference between intraoperative 3D imaging and postoperative CT regarding reduction and implant placement. |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Gesehen am 26.04.2018 |
| Beschreibung: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1749-799X |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s13018-018-0780-7 |