Comparison of two different sampling methods for subgingival plaque: subgingival paper points or mouthrinse sample?
The collection of subgingival plaque samples with paper points is time-consuming and accident-sensitive. However, the collection of saliva is simple and contains pathogens of all intraoral surfaces. The aim of this study is to investigate whether a sampling strategy with mouthrinse (mouthrinse sampl...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
April 2017
|
| In: |
Journal of periodontology
Year: 2017, Jahrgang: 88, Heft: 4, Pages: 399-406 |
| ISSN: | 1943-3670 |
| DOI: | 10.1902/jop.2016.160249 |
| Online-Zugang: | Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2016.160249 Verlag, Volltext: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1902/jop.2016.160249 
|
| Verfasserangaben: | Katrin Nickles, Susanne Scharf, Lasse Röllke, Bettina Dannewitz, and Peter Eickholz |
| Zusammenfassung: | The collection of subgingival plaque samples with paper points is time-consuming and accident-sensitive. However, the collection of saliva is simple and contains pathogens of all intraoral surfaces. The aim of this study is to investigate whether a sampling strategy with mouthrinse (mouthrinse sample [MSP]; test) leads to results comparable with standard sampling method (multiple site test from the deepest pocket of each quadrant [MT4]; control). |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Gesehen am 09.05.2018 |
| Beschreibung: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1943-3670 |
| DOI: | 10.1902/jop.2016.160249 |