Does quantity ensure quality?: standardized OSCE-stations for outcome-oriented evaluation of practical skills at different medical faculties

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Schleicher, Iris (VerfasserIn) , Jünger, Jana (VerfasserIn) , Möltner, Andreas (VerfasserIn) , Frankenhauser, Susanne (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 21 April 2017
In: Annals of anatomy
Year: 2017, Jahrgang: 212, Pages: 55-60
ISSN:1618-0402
DOI:10.1016/j.aanat.2017.03.006
Online-Zugang:Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2017.03.006
Verlag, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0940960217300481?via%3Dihub
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Iris Schleicher, Karsten Leitner, Jana Juenger, Andreas Moeltner, Miriam Ruesseler, Bernd Bender, Jasmina Sterz, Tina Stibane, Sarah Koenig, Susanne Frankenhauser, Joachim Gerhard Kreuder

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1574561030
003 DE-627
005 20220814135618.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180511s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.aanat.2017.03.006  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1574561030 
035 |a (DE-576)504561030 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ504561030 
035 |a (OCoLC)1341008328 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 33  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Schleicher, Iris  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1130726681  |0 (DE-627)885087372  |0 (DE-576)486973506  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Does quantity ensure quality?  |b standardized OSCE-stations for outcome-oriented evaluation of practical skills at different medical faculties  |c Iris Schleicher, Karsten Leitner, Jana Juenger, Andreas Moeltner, Miriam Ruesseler, Bernd Bender, Jasmina Sterz, Tina Stibane, Sarah Koenig, Susanne Frankenhauser, Joachim Gerhard Kreuder 
264 1 |c 21 April 2017 
300 |a 6 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Gesehen am 11.05.2018 
500 |a Background: Practical skills are often assessed using Objective Structured Clinical Skill Exams (OSCE). Nevertheless, in Germany, interchange and agreement between different medical faculties or a general agreement on the minimum standard for passing is lacking. Methods: We developed standardized OSCE-stations for assessing structured clinical examination of knee and shoulder joint with identical checklists and evaluation standards. These were implemented into the OSCE-course at five different medical faculties. Learning objectives for passing the stations were agreed beforehand. At each faculty, one reference examiner scored independently of the local examiner. Outcome of the students at the standardized station was compared between faculties and correlated to their total outcome at the OSCE, to their results at the Part One of the National Medical Licensing Examination as a reference test during medical studies and to their previous amount of lessons in examining joints. Results: Comparing the results of the reference examiner, outcome at the station differed significantly between some of the participating medical faculties. Depending on the faculty, mean total results at the knee-examination-station differed from 64.4% to 77.9% and at the shoulder-examination-station from 62.6% to 79.2%. Differences were seen in knowledge-based items and also in competencies like communication and professional manner. There was a weak correlation between outcome at the joint-examination-OSCE-station and Part One of the National Medical Licensing Examination, and a modest correlation between outcome at the joint-examination-station and total OSCE-result. Correlation to the previous amount of lessons in examining joint was also weak. Conclusion: Although addressing approved learning objectives, different outcomes were achieved when testing a clinical skill at different medical faculties with a standardized OSCE-station. Results can be used as a tool for evaluating lessons, training and curricula at the different sites. Nevertheless, this study shows the importance of information exchange and agreement upon certain benchmarks and evaluation standards when assessing practical skills 
700 1 |a Jünger, Jana  |d 1963-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)118115979  |0 (DE-627)07925246X  |0 (DE-576)291723128  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Möltner, Andreas  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1051790077  |0 (DE-627)786808411  |0 (DE-576)407414037  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Frankenhauser, Susanne  |d 1982-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)137098634  |0 (DE-627)589928252  |0 (DE-576)302142274  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Annals of anatomy  |d Jena : Elsevier, 1992  |g 212(2017), Seite 55-60  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)483300594  |w (DE-600)2182566-X  |w (DE-576)252074742  |x 1618-0402  |7 nnas  |a Does quantity ensure quality? standardized OSCE-stations for outcome-oriented evaluation of practical skills at different medical faculties 
773 1 8 |g volume:212  |g year:2017  |g pages:55-60  |g extent:6  |a Does quantity ensure quality? standardized OSCE-stations for outcome-oriented evaluation of practical skills at different medical faculties 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2017.03.006  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0940960217300481?via%3Dihub  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
992 |a 20180511 
993 |a Article 
994 |a 2017 
998 |g 137098634  |a Frankenhauser, Susanne  |m 137098634:Frankenhauser, Susanne  |d 910000  |d 910300  |e 910000PF137098634  |e 910300PF137098634  |k 0/910000/  |k 1/910000/910300/  |p 10 
998 |g 118115979  |a Jünger, Jana  |m 118115979:Jünger, Jana  |d 50000  |e 50000PJ118115979  |k 0/50000/  |p 3 
998 |g 1051790077  |a Möltner, Andreas  |m 1051790077:Möltner, Andreas  |d 50000  |e 50000PM1051790077  |k 0/50000/  |p 4 
999 |a KXP-PPN1574561030  |e 3009133383 
BIB |a Y 
SER |a journal 
JSO |a {"person":[{"role":"aut","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","display":"Schleicher, Iris","given":"Iris","family":"Schleicher"},{"display":"Jünger, Jana","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","role":"aut","family":"Jünger","given":"Jana"},{"display":"Möltner, Andreas","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","role":"aut","family":"Möltner","given":"Andreas"},{"given":"Susanne","family":"Frankenhauser","role":"aut","display":"Frankenhauser, Susanne","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn"}],"title":[{"title_sort":"Does quantity ensure quality?","subtitle":"standardized OSCE-stations for outcome-oriented evaluation of practical skills at different medical faculties","title":"Does quantity ensure quality?"}],"language":["eng"],"recId":"1574561030","note":["Gesehen am 11.05.2018","Background: Practical skills are often assessed using Objective Structured Clinical Skill Exams (OSCE). Nevertheless, in Germany, interchange and agreement between different medical faculties or a general agreement on the minimum standard for passing is lacking. Methods: We developed standardized OSCE-stations for assessing structured clinical examination of knee and shoulder joint with identical checklists and evaluation standards. These were implemented into the OSCE-course at five different medical faculties. Learning objectives for passing the stations were agreed beforehand. At each faculty, one reference examiner scored independently of the local examiner. Outcome of the students at the standardized station was compared between faculties and correlated to their total outcome at the OSCE, to their results at the Part One of the National Medical Licensing Examination as a reference test during medical studies and to their previous amount of lessons in examining joints. Results: Comparing the results of the reference examiner, outcome at the station differed significantly between some of the participating medical faculties. Depending on the faculty, mean total results at the knee-examination-station differed from 64.4% to 77.9% and at the shoulder-examination-station from 62.6% to 79.2%. Differences were seen in knowledge-based items and also in competencies like communication and professional manner. There was a weak correlation between outcome at the joint-examination-OSCE-station and Part One of the National Medical Licensing Examination, and a modest correlation between outcome at the joint-examination-station and total OSCE-result. Correlation to the previous amount of lessons in examining joint was also weak. Conclusion: Although addressing approved learning objectives, different outcomes were achieved when testing a clinical skill at different medical faculties with a standardized OSCE-station. Results can be used as a tool for evaluating lessons, training and curricula at the different sites. Nevertheless, this study shows the importance of information exchange and agreement upon certain benchmarks and evaluation standards when assessing practical skills"],"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"article-journal"},"name":{"displayForm":["Iris Schleicher, Karsten Leitner, Jana Juenger, Andreas Moeltner, Miriam Ruesseler, Bernd Bender, Jasmina Sterz, Tina Stibane, Sarah Koenig, Susanne Frankenhauser, Joachim Gerhard Kreuder"]},"id":{"eki":["1574561030"],"doi":["10.1016/j.aanat.2017.03.006"]},"origin":[{"dateIssuedKey":"2017","dateIssuedDisp":"21 April 2017"}],"relHost":[{"language":["eng"],"recId":"483300594","disp":"Does quantity ensure quality? standardized OSCE-stations for outcome-oriented evaluation of practical skills at different medical facultiesAnnals of anatomy","type":{"bibl":"periodical","media":"Online-Ressource"},"note":["Gesehen am 09.11.2020"],"part":{"year":"2017","pages":"55-60","volume":"212","text":"212(2017), Seite 55-60","extent":"6"},"titleTranslated":[{"translated":"Anatomischer Anzeiger"}],"pubHistory":["174.1992 -"],"title":[{"title_sort":"Annals of anatomy","subtitle":"official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft = Anatomischer Anzeiger","title":"Annals of anatomy"}],"physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"id":{"zdb":["2182566-X"],"eki":["483300594"],"issn":["1618-0402"]},"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"1992-","publisher":"Elsevier","dateIssuedKey":"1992","publisherPlace":"Jena"}]}],"physDesc":[{"extent":"6 S."}]} 
SRT |a SCHLEICHERDOESQUANTI2120