A randomised, multi-centre, prospective, observer and patient blind study to evaluate a non-absorbable polypropylene mesh vs. a partly absorbable mesh in incisional hernia repair
BACKGROUND: The implantation of a polymer mesh is considered as the standard treatment for incisional hernia. It leads to lower recurrence rates compared to suture techniques without mesh implantation; however, there are also some drawbacks to mesh repair. The operation is more complex and peri-oper...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
3 October 2012
|
| In: |
Langenbeck's archives of surgery
Year: 2012, Jahrgang: 397, Heft: 8, Pages: 1225-1234 |
| ISSN: | 1435-2451 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00423-012-1009-6 |
| Online-Zugang: | Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-012-1009-6 Verlag, Volltext: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00423-012-1009-6 
|
| Verfasserangaben: | A. Rickert, P. Kienle, A. Kuthe, P. Baumann, R. Engemann, J. Kuhlgatz, M. von Frankenberg, H.P. Knaebel, M.W. Büchler |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1575961768 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240316100357.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180604s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00423-012-1009-6 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1575961768 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)505961768 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ505961768 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1341010293 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 33 |2 sdnb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Rickert, Alexander Lothar |d 1973- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)124379842 |0 (DE-627)363307079 |0 (DE-576)294145893 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A randomised, multi-centre, prospective, observer and patient blind study to evaluate a non-absorbable polypropylene mesh vs. a partly absorbable mesh in incisional hernia repair |c A. Rickert, P. Kienle, A. Kuthe, P. Baumann, R. Engemann, J. Kuhlgatz, M. von Frankenberg, H.P. Knaebel, M.W. Büchler |
| 264 | 1 | |c 3 October 2012 | |
| 300 | |a 10 | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Gesehen am 04.06.2018 | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: The implantation of a polymer mesh is considered as the standard treatment for incisional hernia. It leads to lower recurrence rates compared to suture techniques without mesh implantation; however, there are also some drawbacks to mesh repair. The operation is more complex and peri-operative infectious complications are increased. Yet it is not clear to what extent a mesh implantation influences quality of life or leads to chronic pain or discomfort. The influence of the material, textile structure and size of the mesh remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate if a non-absorbable, large pore-sized, lightweight polypropylene (PP) mesh leads to a better health outcome compared to a partly absorbable mesh. METHODS/DESIGN: In this randomised, double-blinded study, 80 patients with incisional hernia after a median laparotomy received in sublay technique either a non-absorbable mesh (Optilene® Mesh Elastic) or a partly absorbable mesh (Ultrapro® Mesh). Primary endpoint was the physical health score from the SF-36 questionnaire 21 days post-operatively. Secondary variables were patients' daily activity score, pain score, wound assessment and post-surgical complications until 6 months post-operatively. RESULTS: SF-36, daily activity and pain scores were similar in both groups after 21 days and 6 months, respectively. No hernia recurrence was observed during the observation period. Post-operative complication rates also showed no difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: The implantation of a non-absorbable, large pore-sized, lightweight PP mesh for incisional hernia leads to similar patient-related outcome parameters, recurrence and complication rates as a partly absorbable mesh. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Absorbable Implants | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Adult | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Aged | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Double-Blind Method | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Health Status | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hernia, Ventral | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Herniorrhaphy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Humans | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Middle Aged | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Pain Measurement | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Polypropylenes | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Postoperative Complications | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Quality of Life | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Surgical Mesh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Surveys and Questionnaires | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kienle, Peter |d 1966- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1030310262 |0 (DE-627)735023476 |0 (DE-576)378115898 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Büchler, Markus W. |d 1955- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)120893339 |0 (DE-627)080952526 |0 (DE-576)292434146 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Langenbeck's archives of surgery |d Berlin : Springer, 1998 |g 397(2012), 8, Seite 1225-1234 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)253770440 |w (DE-600)1459390-7 |w (DE-576)072578564 |x 1435-2451 |7 nnas |a A randomised, multi-centre, prospective, observer and patient blind study to evaluate a non-absorbable polypropylene mesh vs. a partly absorbable mesh in incisional hernia repair |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:397 |g year:2012 |g number:8 |g pages:1225-1234 |g extent:10 |a A randomised, multi-centre, prospective, observer and patient blind study to evaluate a non-absorbable polypropylene mesh vs. a partly absorbable mesh in incisional hernia repair |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-012-1009-6 |x Verlag |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00423-012-1009-6 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 992 | |a 20180604 | ||
| 993 | |a Article | ||
| 994 | |a 2012 | ||
| 998 | |g 120893339 |a Büchler, Markus W. |m 120893339:Büchler, Markus W. |d 910000 |d 910200 |e 910000PB120893339 |e 910200PB120893339 |k 0/910000/ |k 1/910000/910200/ |p 9 |y j | ||
| 998 | |g 1030310262 |a Kienle, Peter |m 1030310262:Kienle, Peter |d 60000 |d 50000 |e 60000PK1030310262 |e 50000PK1030310262 |k 0/60000/ |k 0/50000/ |p 2 | ||
| 998 | |g 124379842 |a Rickert, Alexander Lothar |m 124379842:Rickert, Alexander Lothar |d 60000 |d 61800 |e 60000PR124379842 |e 61800PR124379842 |k 0/60000/ |k 1/60000/61800/ |p 1 |x j | ||
| 999 | |a KXP-PPN1575961768 |e 3011477434 | ||
| BIB | |a Y | ||
| SER | |a journal | ||
| JSO | |a {"id":{"eki":["1575961768"],"doi":["10.1007/s00423-012-1009-6"]},"note":["Gesehen am 04.06.2018"],"type":{"bibl":"article-journal","media":"Online-Ressource"},"person":[{"role":"aut","display":"Rickert, Alexander Lothar","family":"Rickert","given":"Alexander Lothar"},{"display":"Kienle, Peter","role":"aut","family":"Kienle","given":"Peter"},{"role":"aut","display":"Büchler, Markus W.","given":"Markus W.","family":"Büchler"}],"language":["eng"],"title":[{"title":"A randomised, multi-centre, prospective, observer and patient blind study to evaluate a non-absorbable polypropylene mesh vs. a partly absorbable mesh in incisional hernia repair","title_sort":"randomised, multi-centre, prospective, observer and patient blind study to evaluate a non-absorbable polypropylene mesh vs. a partly absorbable mesh in incisional hernia repair"}],"recId":"1575961768","relHost":[{"recId":"253770440","origin":[{"publisherPlace":"Berlin ; Heidelberg","dateIssuedKey":"1998","dateIssuedDisp":"1998-","publisher":"Springer"}],"corporate":[{"role":"isb","display":"Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie"}],"part":{"year":"2012","text":"397(2012), 8, Seite 1225-1234","issue":"8","extent":"10","volume":"397","pages":"1225-1234"},"note":["Gesehen am 24.03.25","Teils ungezählte Beil.: Supplement"],"title":[{"subtitle":"continues Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie : organ of the congresses of the German Society of Surgery : official journal of the German Association of Endocrine Surgeons, affiliated to the German Society of Surgery","title_sort":"Langenbeck's archives of surgery","title":"Langenbeck's archives of surgery"}],"pubHistory":["Volume 383, issue 1 (March 1998)-"],"physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"disp":"A randomised, multi-centre, prospective, observer and patient blind study to evaluate a non-absorbable polypropylene mesh vs. a partly absorbable mesh in incisional hernia repairLangenbeck's archives of surgery","id":{"eki":["253770440"],"zdb":["1459390-7"],"issn":["1435-2451"]},"language":["eng"],"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"periodical"}}],"name":{"displayForm":["A. Rickert, P. Kienle, A. Kuthe, P. Baumann, R. Engemann, J. Kuhlgatz, M. von Frankenberg, H.P. Knaebel, M.W. Büchler"]},"origin":[{"dateIssuedKey":"2012","dateIssuedDisp":"3 October 2012"}],"physDesc":[{"extent":"10 S."}]} | ||
| SRT | |a RICKERTALERANDOMISED3201 | ||