Transperineal reanastomosis for treatment of highly recurrent anastomotic strictures after radical retropubic prostatectomy: extended follow-up

ObjectivesTo re-evaluate safety and efficacy of transperineal reanastomosis (TPRA) as a viable therapeutic option in highly recurrent anastomotic strictures (AS) after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).MethodsRetrospective analysis by standardized questionnaire inquiring for recurrence of stric...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Schüttfort, Victor (VerfasserIn) , Pfalzgraf, Daniel Philipp (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 3 July 2017
In: World journal of urology
Year: 2017, Jahrgang: 35, Heft: 12, Pages: 1885-1890
ISSN:1433-8726
DOI:10.1007/s00345-017-2067-8
Online-Zugang:Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2067-8
Verlag, Volltext: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00345-017-2067-8
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Victor Maximilian Schuettfort, Roland Dahlem, Luis Kluth, Daniel Pfalzgraf, Clemens Rosenbaum, Tim Ludwig, Margit Fisch, Christoph-Philip Reiss
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ObjectivesTo re-evaluate safety and efficacy of transperineal reanastomosis (TPRA) as a viable therapeutic option in highly recurrent anastomotic strictures (AS) after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).MethodsRetrospective analysis by standardized questionnaire inquiring for recurrence of stricture, stress urinary incontinence (SUI), sexual function, satisfaction, and changes in quality of life (QoL) was performed in all patients undergoing TPRA. Validated questionnaires (ICIQ-UI, EQ-5D, and IPSS) were included.ResultsMedian follow-up was 45.0 months. The average number of prior operations was 4.69. Success rate was 87% (20/23). Three recurrences were successfully treated via endoscopic means. All patients had urinary incontinence pre-op and post-op. Implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) has been performed successfully in 73.9% (17/23). Rate of complications was low (8.7%; 2/23, Clavien-Dindo Grade II + III). EQ-5D-VAS showed a good general state of health (73.5/100). An improvement in QoL was noted in 63.6% (14/22) and patient satisfaction was high (72.7%; 16/22).ConclusionsThis extended follow-up confirms the initial results for TPRA as an excellent treatment option for highly recurrent AS after RRP. Postoperative SUI as a consequence of transsphincteric urethral mobilization can be satisfactorily treated by the implantation of AUS. In case of AS recalcitrant to endoscopic treatment, the described procedure—even though technically challenging—represents a valuable treatment option.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 07.06.2018
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1433-8726
DOI:10.1007/s00345-017-2067-8