Correlation between intrafractional motion and dosimetric changes for prostate IMRT: comparison of different adaptive strategies

Purpose: To retrospectively analyze and estimate the dosimetric benefit of online and offline motion mitigation strategies for prostate IMRT. Methods: Intrafractional motion data of 21 prostate patients receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy was acquired with an electromagnetic tracking system....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Saito, Nami (VerfasserIn) , Schmitt, Daniela (VerfasserIn) , Bangert, Mark (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 03 June 2018
In: Journal of applied clinical medical physics
Year: 2018, Jahrgang: 19, Heft: 4, Pages: 87-97
ISSN:1526-9914
DOI:10.1002/acm2.12359
Online-Zugang:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12359
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/acm2.12359
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Nami Saito, Daniela Schmitt, Mark Bangert

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1578101387
003 DE-627
005 20230426230809.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180731s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1002/acm2.12359  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1578101387 
035 |a (DE-576)508101387 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ508101387 
035 |a (OCoLC)1264004294 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 33  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Saito, Nami  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1163625825  |0 (DE-627)1027943454  |0 (DE-576)508100216  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Correlation between intrafractional motion and dosimetric changes for prostate IMRT  |b comparison of different adaptive strategies  |c Nami Saito, Daniela Schmitt, Mark Bangert 
264 1 |c 03 June 2018 
300 |a 11 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Gesehen am 31.07.2018 
520 |a Purpose: To retrospectively analyze and estimate the dosimetric benefit of online and offline motion mitigation strategies for prostate IMRT. Methods: Intrafractional motion data of 21 prostate patients receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy was acquired with an electromagnetic tracking system. Target trajectories of 734 fractions were analyzed per delivered multileaf-collimator segment in five motion metrics: three-dimensional displacement, distance from beam axis (DistToBeam), and three orthogonal components. Time-resolved dose calculations have been performed by shifting the target according to the sampled motion for the following scenarios: without adaptation, online-repositioning with a minimum threshold of 3 mm, and an offline approach using a modified field order applying horizontal before vertical beams. Change of D95 (targets) or V65 (organs at risk) relative to the static case, that is, ΔD95 or ΔV65, was extracted per fraction in percent. Correlation coefficients (CC) between the motion metrics and the dose metrics were extracted. Mean of patient-wise CC was used to evaluate the correlation of motion metric and dosimetric changes. Mean and standard deviation of the patient-wise correlation slopes (in %/mm) were extracted. Results: For ΔD95 of the prostate, mean DistToBeam per fraction showed the highest correlation for all scenarios with a relative change of −0.6 ± 0.7%/mm without adaptation and −0.4 ± 0.5%/mm for the repositioning and field order strategies. For ΔV65 of the bladder and the rectum, superior-inferior and posterior-anterior motion components per fraction showed the highest correlation, respectively. The slope of bladder (rectum) was 14.6 ± 5.8 (15.1 ± 6.9) %/mm without adaptation, 14.0 ± 4.9 (14.5 ± 7.4) %/mm for repositioning with 3 mm, and 10.6 ± 2.5 (8.1 ± 4.6) %/mm for the field order approach. Conclusions: The correlation slope is a valuable concept to estimate dosimetric deviations from static plan quality directly based on the observed motion. For the prostate, both mitigation strategies showed comparable benefit. For organs at risk, the field order approach showed less sensitive response regarding motion and reduced interpatient variation. 
650 4 |a adaptive treatment 
650 4 |a electromagnetic tracking 
650 4 |a IMRT 
650 4 |a intrafractional motion 
650 4 |a prostate cancer 
700 1 |a Schmitt, Daniela  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1061089223  |0 (DE-627)804315590  |0 (DE-576)417190239  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Bangert, Mark  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1014143322  |0 (DE-627)70517364X  |0 (DE-576)348353847  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of applied clinical medical physics  |d Reston, Va. : ACMP, 2000  |g 19(2018), 4, Seite 87-97  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)312202091  |w (DE-600)2010347-5  |w (DE-576)281192669  |x 1526-9914  |7 nnas  |a Correlation between intrafractional motion and dosimetric changes for prostate IMRT comparison of different adaptive strategies 
773 1 8 |g volume:19  |g year:2018  |g number:4  |g pages:87-97  |g extent:11  |a Correlation between intrafractional motion and dosimetric changes for prostate IMRT comparison of different adaptive strategies 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12359  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/acm2.12359  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
992 |a 20180731 
993 |a Article 
994 |a 2018 
998 |g 1014143322  |a Bangert, Mark  |m 1014143322:Bangert, Mark  |d 130000  |e 130000PB1014143322  |k 0/130000/  |p 3  |y j 
998 |g 1061089223  |a Schmitt, Daniela  |m 1061089223:Schmitt, Daniela  |d 910000  |d 911400  |e 910000PS1061089223  |e 911400PS1061089223  |k 0/910000/  |k 1/910000/911400/  |p 2 
998 |g 1163625825  |a Saito, Nami  |m 1163625825:Saito, Nami  |d 910000  |d 911400  |e 910000PS1163625825  |e 911400PS1163625825  |k 0/910000/  |k 1/910000/911400/  |p 1  |x j 
999 |a KXP-PPN1578101387  |e 3019800455 
BIB |a Y 
SER |a journal 
JSO |a {"title":[{"title":"Correlation between intrafractional motion and dosimetric changes for prostate IMRT","subtitle":"comparison of different adaptive strategies","title_sort":"Correlation between intrafractional motion and dosimetric changes for prostate IMRT"}],"person":[{"given":"Nami","family":"Saito","role":"aut","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","display":"Saito, Nami"},{"family":"Schmitt","given":"Daniela","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","display":"Schmitt, Daniela","role":"aut"},{"given":"Mark","family":"Bangert","role":"aut","display":"Bangert, Mark","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn"}],"recId":"1578101387","language":["eng"],"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"article-journal"},"note":["Gesehen am 31.07.2018"],"id":{"eki":["1578101387"],"doi":["10.1002/acm2.12359"]},"origin":[{"dateIssuedKey":"2018","dateIssuedDisp":"03 June 2018"}],"name":{"displayForm":["Nami Saito, Daniela Schmitt, Mark Bangert"]},"relHost":[{"title":[{"title_sort":"Journal of applied clinical medical physics","title":"Journal of applied clinical medical physics"}],"pubHistory":["1.2000 -"],"part":{"volume":"19","text":"19(2018), 4, Seite 87-97","extent":"11","year":"2018","issue":"4","pages":"87-97"},"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"periodical"},"disp":"Correlation between intrafractional motion and dosimetric changes for prostate IMRT comparison of different adaptive strategiesJournal of applied clinical medical physics","note":["Gesehen am 17. Januar 2017"],"language":["eng"],"recId":"312202091","origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"2000-","dateIssuedKey":"2000","publisher":"ACMP","publisherPlace":"Reston, Va."}],"id":{"issn":["1526-9914"],"eki":["312202091"],"zdb":["2010347-5"]},"name":{"displayForm":["American College of Medical Physics"]},"physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}]}],"physDesc":[{"extent":"11 S."}]} 
SRT |a SAITONAMISCORRELATIO0320