Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones: a cumulative analysis of comparative studies
ObjectiveTo analyze the current evidence on the use of ureteroscopy (URS) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for the management of obstructing ureteral stones in emergent setting.MethodsA systematic literature review was performed up to June 2016 using Pubmed and Ovid databases to iden...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
23 February 2017
|
| In: |
Urolithiasis
Year: 2017, Jahrgang: 45, Heft: 6, Pages: 563-572 |
| ISSN: | 2194-7236 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00240-017-0960-7 |
| Online-Zugang: | Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-0960-7 Verlag, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-0960-7 
|
| Verfasserangaben: | Davide Arcaniolo, Marco De Sio, Jens Rassweiler, Jilian Nicholas, Estevão Lima, Giuseppe Carrieri, Evangelos Liatsikos, Vincenzo Mirone, Manoj Monga, Riccardo Autorino |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1581338813 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220815021518.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180926s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00240-017-0960-7 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1581338813 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)511338813 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ511338813 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1341019037 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 33 |2 sdnb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Arcaniolo, Davide |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1167896203 |0 (DE-627)1031417974 |0 (DE-576)511338678 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones |b a cumulative analysis of comparative studies |c Davide Arcaniolo, Marco De Sio, Jens Rassweiler, Jilian Nicholas, Estevão Lima, Giuseppe Carrieri, Evangelos Liatsikos, Vincenzo Mirone, Manoj Monga, Riccardo Autorino |
| 264 | 1 | |c 23 February 2017 | |
| 300 | |a 10 | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Gesehen am 26.09.2018 | ||
| 520 | |a ObjectiveTo analyze the current evidence on the use of ureteroscopy (URS) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for the management of obstructing ureteral stones in emergent setting.MethodsA systematic literature review was performed up to June 2016 using Pubmed and Ovid databases to identify pertinent studies. The PRISMA criteria were followed for article selection. Separate searches were done using a combinations of several search terms: “laser lithotripsy”, “ureteroscopy”, “extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy”, “ESWL”, “rapid”, “immediate”, “early”, “delayed”, “late”, “ureteral stones”, “kidney stones”, “renal stones”. Only titles related to emergent/rapid/immediate/early (as viably defined in each study) versus delayed/late treatment of ureteral stones with either URS and/or ESWL were considered for screening. Demographics and operative outcomes were compared between emergent and delayed lithotripsy. RevMan review manager software was used to perform data analysis.ResultsFour studies comparing emergent (n = 526) versus delayed (n = 987) URS and six studies comparing emergent (n = 356) versus delayed (n = 355) SWL were included in the analysis. Emergent URS did not show any significant difference in terms of stone-free rate (91.2 versus 90.9%; OR 1.04; CI 0.71, 1.52; p = 0.84), complication rate (8.7% for emergent versus 11.5% for delayed; OR 0.94; CI 0.65, 1.36; p = 0.74) and need for auxiliary procedures (OR 0.85; CI 0.42, 1.7; p = 0.85) when compared to delayed URS. Emergent ESWL was associated with a higher likelihood of stone free status (OR 2.2; CI 1.55, 3.17; p < 0.001) and a lower likelihood of need for auxiliary maneuvers (OR 0.49; CI 0.33, 0.72; p < 0.001) than the delayed procedure. No differences in complication rates were noticed between the emergent and delayed ESWL (p = 0.37).ConclusionsEmergent lithotripsy, either ureteroscopic or extracorporeal, can be offered as an effective and safe treatment for patients with symptomatic ureteral stone. If amenable to ESWL, based on stone and patient characteristics, an emergent approach should be strongly considered. Ureteroscopy in the emergent setting is mostly reserved for distally located stones. The implementation of these therapeutic approaches is likely to be dictated by their availability. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Emergency | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Shock wave lithotripsy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ureteral stone | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ureteroscopy | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rassweiler, Jens |d 1955- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1067480307 |0 (DE-627)818791225 |0 (DE-576)426692713 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Urolithiasis |d Berlin : Springer, 2013 |g 45(2017), 6, Seite 563-572 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)735684456 |w (DE-600)2700610-4 |w (DE-576)378488619 |x 2194-7236 |7 nnas |a Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones a cumulative analysis of comparative studies |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:45 |g year:2017 |g number:6 |g pages:563-572 |g extent:10 |a Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones a cumulative analysis of comparative studies |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-0960-7 |x Verlag |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-0960-7 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 992 | |a 20180926 | ||
| 993 | |a Article | ||
| 994 | |a 2017 | ||
| 998 | |g 1067480307 |a Rassweiler, Jens |m 1067480307:Rassweiler, Jens |d 50000 |e 50000PR1067480307 |k 0/50000/ |p 3 | ||
| 999 | |a KXP-PPN1581338813 |e 3027278320 | ||
| BIB | |a Y | ||
| SER | |a journal | ||
| JSO | |a {"note":["Gesehen am 26.09.2018"],"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"article-journal"},"recId":"1581338813","language":["eng"],"person":[{"given":"Davide","family":"Arcaniolo","role":"aut","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","display":"Arcaniolo, Davide"},{"family":"Rassweiler","given":"Jens","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","display":"Rassweiler, Jens","role":"aut"}],"title":[{"title_sort":"Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones","subtitle":"a cumulative analysis of comparative studies","title":"Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones"}],"physDesc":[{"extent":"10 S."}],"relHost":[{"id":{"issn":["2194-7236"],"eki":["735684456"],"zdb":["2700610-4"]},"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"2013-","publisher":"Springer","dateIssuedKey":"2013","publisherPlace":"Berlin ; Heidelberg ; New York"}],"title":[{"title_sort":"Urolithiasis","title":"Urolithiasis"}],"part":{"text":"45(2017), 6, Seite 563-572","volume":"45","extent":"10","year":"2017","issue":"6","pages":"563-572"},"pubHistory":["41.2013 -"],"language":["eng"],"recId":"735684456","physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"disp":"Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones a cumulative analysis of comparative studiesUrolithiasis","type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"periodical"}}],"name":{"displayForm":["Davide Arcaniolo, Marco De Sio, Jens Rassweiler, Jilian Nicholas, Estevão Lima, Giuseppe Carrieri, Evangelos Liatsikos, Vincenzo Mirone, Manoj Monga, Riccardo Autorino"]},"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"23 February 2017","dateIssuedKey":"2017"}],"id":{"doi":["10.1007/s00240-017-0960-7"],"eki":["1581338813"]}} | ||
| SRT | |a ARCANIOLODEMERGENTVE2320 | ||