Pressurisation leads to better cement penetration into the glenoid bone

The aim of this study was to compare a third-generation cementing procedure for glenoid components with a new technique for cement pressurisation. In 20 pairs of scapulae, 20 keeled and 20 pegged glenoid components were implanted using either a third-generation cementing technique (group 1) or a new...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Raiss, Patric (VerfasserIn) , Sowa, Boris (VerfasserIn) , Bruckner, Thomas (VerfasserIn) , Eck, Simon (VerfasserIn) , Wörz, Stefan (VerfasserIn) , Rohr, Karl (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2012
In: The bone & joint journal
Year: 2012, Jahrgang: 94-B, Heft: 5, Pages: 671-677
ISSN:2049-4408
DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.94B5.28831
Online-Zugang:Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B5.28831
Verlag, Volltext: https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/full/10.1302/0301-620X.94B5.28831
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:P. Raiss, B. Sowa, T. Bruckner, S. Eck, S. Woerz, K. Rohr, M. Rickert, P. Kasten
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of this study was to compare a third-generation cementing procedure for glenoid components with a new technique for cement pressurisation. In 20 pairs of scapulae, 20 keeled and 20 pegged glenoid components were implanted using either a third-generation cementing technique (group 1) or a new pressuriser (group 2). Cement penetration was measured by three-dimensional (3D) analysis of micro-CT scans. The mean 3D depth of penetration of the cement was significantly greater in group 2 (p < 0.001). The mean thickness of the cement mantle for keeled glenoids was 2.50 mm (2.0 to 3.3) in group 1 and 5.18 mm (4.4 to 6.1) in group 2, and for pegged glenoids it was 1.72 mm (0.9 to 2.3) in group 1 and 5.63 mm (3.6 to 6.4) in group 2. A cement mantle < 2 mm was detected less frequently in group 2 (p < 0.001). Using the cement pressuriser the proportion of cement mantles < 2 mm was significantly reduced compared with the third-generation cementing technique.
Beschreibung:Published online: 1 May 2012
Gesehen am 04.10.2018
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:2049-4408
DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.94B5.28831