Sekundärmalignome in Harnableitungen

In contrast to ureterosigmoidostomy no reliable clinical data exist for tumor risk in different forms of urinary diversion using isolated intestinal segments.In 44 German urological departments, operation frequencies, indications, patient age, and operation dates of the different forms of urinary di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kälble, Tilman (Author) , Alken, Peter (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:German
Published: April 2012
In: Der Urologe
Year: 2012, Volume: 51, Issue: 4, Pages: 500-506
DOI:10.1007/s00120-012-2815-8
Online Access:Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00120-012-2815-8
Verlag, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-012-2815-8
Get full text
Author Notes:T. Kälble, I. Hofmann, J.W. Thüroff, R. Stein, R. Hautmann, H. Riedmiller, D. Vergho, L. Hertle, C. Wülfing, M. Truß, S. Roth, F.C. von Rundstedt, P. Albers, J. Gschwend, K. Herkommer, U. Humke, M. Spahn, P. Bader, J. Steffens, R. Harzmann, C.G. Stief, A. Karl, S.C. Müller, M. Waldner, J. Noldus, K. Kleinschmidt, P. Alken, B. Kopper, M. Fisch, A. Lampel, A. Stenzel, J. Fichtner, B. Flath, H. Rübben, K.P. Juenemann, S. Hautmann, A. Knipper, D. Leusmann, W. Strohmaier, W.F. Thon, S. Miller, K. Weingärtner, A. Schilling, H. Piechota, J.E. Becht, H. Schwaibold, P. Bub, S. Conrad, U. Wenderoth, W. Merkle, W. Rösch, T. Otto, B. Ulshöfer, M. Westenfelder

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1583921257
003 DE-627
005 20220815062431.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 181121s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||ger c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s00120-012-2815-8  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1583921257 
035 |a (DE-576)513921257 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ513921257 
035 |a (OCoLC)1341023982 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a ger 
084 |a 33  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Kälble, Tilman  |d 1959-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1112496343  |0 (DE-627)866475885  |0 (DE-576)169927881  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Sekundärmalignome in Harnableitungen  |c T. Kälble, I. Hofmann, J.W. Thüroff, R. Stein, R. Hautmann, H. Riedmiller, D. Vergho, L. Hertle, C. Wülfing, M. Truß, S. Roth, F.C. von Rundstedt, P. Albers, J. Gschwend, K. Herkommer, U. Humke, M. Spahn, P. Bader, J. Steffens, R. Harzmann, C.G. Stief, A. Karl, S.C. Müller, M. Waldner, J. Noldus, K. Kleinschmidt, P. Alken, B. Kopper, M. Fisch, A. Lampel, A. Stenzel, J. Fichtner, B. Flath, H. Rübben, K.P. Juenemann, S. Hautmann, A. Knipper, D. Leusmann, W. Strohmaier, W.F. Thon, S. Miller, K. Weingärtner, A. Schilling, H. Piechota, J.E. Becht, H. Schwaibold, P. Bub, S. Conrad, U. Wenderoth, W. Merkle, W. Rösch, T. Otto, B. Ulshöfer, M. Westenfelder 
264 1 |c April 2012 
300 |a 7 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Gesehen am 21.11.2018 
520 |a In contrast to ureterosigmoidostomy no reliable clinical data exist for tumor risk in different forms of urinary diversion using isolated intestinal segments.In 44 German urological departments, operation frequencies, indications, patient age, and operation dates of the different forms of urinary diversion, operated between 1970 and 2007, could be registered. The secondary tumors up to 2009 were registered as well and related to the numbers of the different forms of urinary diversions resulting in tumor prevalences.In 17,758 urinary diversions 32 secondary tumors occurred. The tumor risk in ureterosigmoidostomy (22-fold) and cystoplasty (13-fold) is significantly higher than in other continent forms of urinary diversion such as neobladders or pouches (p<0.0001). The difference between ureterosigmoidostomy and cystoplasty is not significant, nor is the difference between ileocecal pouches (0.14%) and ileal neobladders (0.05%) (p=0.46). The tumor risk in ileocecal (1.26%) and colonic neobladders (1.43%) is significantly higher (p=0.0001) than in ileal neobladders (0.5%). Of the 16 tumors that occurred following ureterosigmoidostomy, 16 (94%) developed directly at the ureterocolonic borderline in contrast to only 50% following urinary diversions via isolated intestinal segments.From postoperative year 5 regular endoscopic controls of ureterosigmoidostomies, cystoplasties, and orthotopic (ileo-)colonic neobladders are necessary. In ileocecal pouches, regular endoscopy is necessary at least in the presence of symptoms or should be performed routinely at greater intervals. Following neobladders or conduits, only urethroscopies for urethral recurrence are necessary. 
650 4 |a Darmsegmente 
650 4 |a Harnableitung 
650 4 |a Intestinal segments 
650 4 |a Secondary tumor 
650 4 |a Sekundäre Tumore 
650 4 |a Ureterosigmoideostomie 
650 4 |a Ureterosigmoidostomy 
650 4 |a Urinary diversion 
700 1 |a Alken, Peter  |d 1942-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1036718352  |0 (DE-627)751026972  |0 (DE-576)385351941  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Der Urologe  |d [Berlin : Springer Medizin, 2005  |g 51(2012), 4, Seite 500-506  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)101704192X  |w (DE-600)2925337-8  |w (DE-576)501620842  |7 nnas  |a Sekundärmalignome in Harnableitungen 
773 1 8 |g volume:51  |g year:2012  |g number:4  |g pages:500-506  |g extent:7  |a Sekundärmalignome in Harnableitungen 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00120-012-2815-8  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-012-2815-8  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
992 |a 20181121 
993 |a Article 
994 |a 2012 
998 |g 1036718352  |a Alken, Peter  |m 1036718352:Alken, Peter  |d 60000  |d 63100  |e 60000PA1036718352  |e 63100PA1036718352  |k 0/60000/  |k 1/60000/63100/  |p 27 
999 |a KXP-PPN1583921257  |e 303285380X 
BIB |a Y 
SER |a journal 
JSO |a {"relHost":[{"id":{"eki":["101704192X"],"zdb":["2925337-8"]},"origin":[{"publisherPlace":"[Berlin ; Heidelberg ; New York]","publisher":"Springer Medizin","dateIssuedDisp":"[2005-2022]"}],"name":{"displayForm":["Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie"]},"physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"title":[{"title_sort":"Urologe","title":"Der Urologe"}],"part":{"year":"2012","issue":"4","pages":"500-506","volume":"51","text":"51(2012), 4, Seite 500-506","extent":"7"},"pubHistory":["Volume 44, issue 7 (July 2005)-volume 61, issue 5 (May 2022)"],"corporate":[{"role":"isb","roleDisplay":"Herausgebendes Organ","display":"Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie"}],"language":["ger"],"recId":"101704192X","note":["Gesehen am 05.07.2022"],"disp":"Sekundärmalignome in HarnableitungenDer Urologe","type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"periodical"}}],"physDesc":[{"extent":"7 S."}],"id":{"eki":["1583921257"],"doi":["10.1007/s00120-012-2815-8"]},"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"April 2012","dateIssuedKey":"2012"}],"name":{"displayForm":["T. Kälble, I. Hofmann, J.W. Thüroff, R. Stein, R. Hautmann, H. Riedmiller, D. Vergho, L. Hertle, C. Wülfing, M. Truß, S. Roth, F.C. von Rundstedt, P. Albers, J. Gschwend, K. Herkommer, U. Humke, M. Spahn, P. Bader, J. Steffens, R. Harzmann, C.G. Stief, A. Karl, S.C. Müller, M. Waldner, J. Noldus, K. Kleinschmidt, P. Alken, B. Kopper, M. Fisch, A. Lampel, A. Stenzel, J. Fichtner, B. Flath, H. Rübben, K.P. Juenemann, S. Hautmann, A. Knipper, D. Leusmann, W. Strohmaier, W.F. Thon, S. Miller, K. Weingärtner, A. Schilling, H. Piechota, J.E. Becht, H. Schwaibold, P. Bub, S. Conrad, U. Wenderoth, W. Merkle, W. Rösch, T. Otto, B. Ulshöfer, M. Westenfelder"]},"recId":"1583921257","language":["ger"],"type":{"bibl":"article-journal","media":"Online-Ressource"},"note":["Gesehen am 21.11.2018"],"title":[{"title":"Sekundärmalignome in Harnableitungen","title_sort":"Sekundärmalignome in Harnableitungen"}],"person":[{"role":"aut","display":"Kälble, Tilman","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","given":"Tilman","family":"Kälble"},{"role":"aut","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","display":"Alken, Peter","given":"Peter","family":"Alken"}]} 
SRT |a KAELBLETILSEKUNDAERM2012