Comparison of radiation exposure associated with intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography and follow-up multidetector computed tomography Angiography for evaluating endovascular aneurysm repairs

Purpose: To compare the radiation exposure associated with intraoperative contrast-enhanced cone-beam computed tomography (ceCBCT) acquisitions to standard 3-phase multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) angiography used for assessing technical success after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Metho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Steuwe, Andrea (VerfasserIn) , Geisbüsch, Philipp (VerfasserIn) , Schulz, Christof (VerfasserIn) , Böckler, Dittmar (VerfasserIn) , Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich (VerfasserIn) , Stiller, Wolfram (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 18 May 2016
In: Journal of endovascular therapy
Year: 2016, Jahrgang: 23, Heft: 4, Pages: 583-592
ISSN:1545-1550
DOI:10.1177/1526602816649588
Online-Zugang:Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1526602816649588
Verlag, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1177/1526602816649588
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Andrea Steuwe, Philipp Geisbüsch, Christof J. Schulz, Dittmar Böckler, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, and Wolfram Stiller

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1584741848
003 DE-627
005 20230427161337.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 181203s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/1526602816649588  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1584741848 
035 |a (DE-576)514741848 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ514741848 
035 |a (OCoLC)1341024852 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 33  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Steuwe, Andrea  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1172688753  |0 (DE-627)1041322763  |0 (DE-576)514738383  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Comparison of radiation exposure associated with intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography and follow-up multidetector computed tomography Angiography for evaluating endovascular aneurysm repairs  |c Andrea Steuwe, Philipp Geisbüsch, Christof J. Schulz, Dittmar Böckler, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, and Wolfram Stiller 
264 1 |c 18 May 2016 
300 |a 10 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Gesehen am 03.12.2018 
520 |a Purpose: To compare the radiation exposure associated with intraoperative contrast-enhanced cone-beam computed tomography (ceCBCT) acquisitions to standard 3-phase multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) angiography used for assessing technical success after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Methods: Effective doses (EDs) were calculated for 66 EVAR patients (mean age 71 years; 61 men) with a mean 27.7-kg/m2 body mass index (range 17-49) who had both intraoperative ceCBCT and postoperative 3-phase MDCT angiography between November 2012 and April 2015. In addition, EDs were directly determined using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) embedded in anthropomorphic phantoms with body mass indexes of 22 and 30 kg/m2. Effective doses were calculated by summing doses recorded by all TLDs corresponding to a specific tissue type before applying the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 60 and 103 weighting factors. EDs were compared with each other for both imaging modalities as well as to TLD measurements. Results: Average EDs of the patient collective were 4.9±1.1 mSv for ceCBCT, 2.6±1.2 mSv for single-phase MDCT (46% decrease, covering solely the area of the implanted endograft), and 13.6±5.5 mSv for comprehensive 3-phase MDCT examinations (178% increase, anatomical coverage from the aortic arch to femoral artery bifurcation). EDs determined in phantom measurements ranged from 3.1 to 4.5 mSv for ceCBCT, amounting to 2.6 mSv for a single MDCT phase (15% to 40% decrease) using ICRP 60 conversion factors. Applying ICRP 103 factors resulted in higher values for ceCBCT and slightly lower ones for MDCT. Conclusion: ceCBCT offers the chance for immediate intraoperative revisions of endograft-related problems. Requiring only a single-phase acquisition, ceCBCT is associated with a considerable reduction in ED (50%-75%) compared to standard 3-phase MDCT angiography after EVAR. On the other hand, MDCT has a larger field of view and is associated with less radiation exposure for a single phase (reduction of 20%-60%) if only the stented region is covered; however, MDCT angiography also uses larger amounts of contrast. 
700 1 |a Geisbüsch, Philipp  |d 1978-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)130138061  |0 (DE-627)491722222  |0 (DE-576)298019787  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Schulz, Christof  |d 1990-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1152848607  |0 (DE-627)1014117143  |0 (DE-576)499937597  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Böckler, Dittmar  |d 1966-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1032367881  |0 (DE-627)738382868  |0 (DE-576)173503969  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich  |d 1962-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)139267123  |0 (DE-627)70327113X  |0 (DE-576)310955327  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Stiller, Wolfram  |d 1976-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)105822672X  |0 (DE-627)796627495  |0 (DE-576)414249496  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of endovascular therapy  |d Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage, 2000  |g 23(2016), 4, Seite 583-592  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)330217410  |w (DE-600)2049858-5  |w (DE-576)34699313X  |x 1545-1550  |7 nnas  |a Comparison of radiation exposure associated with intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography and follow-up multidetector computed tomography Angiography for evaluating endovascular aneurysm repairs 
773 1 8 |g volume:23  |g year:2016  |g number:4  |g pages:583-592  |g extent:10  |a Comparison of radiation exposure associated with intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography and follow-up multidetector computed tomography Angiography for evaluating endovascular aneurysm repairs 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1526602816649588  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/1526602816649588  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
992 |a 20181203 
993 |a Article 
994 |a 2016 
998 |g 105822672X  |a Stiller, Wolfram  |m 105822672X:Stiller, Wolfram  |d 910000  |d 911400  |e 910000PS105822672X  |e 911400PS105822672X  |k 0/910000/  |k 1/910000/911400/  |p 6  |y j 
998 |g 139267123  |a Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich  |m 139267123:Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich  |d 910000  |d 911400  |e 910000PK139267123  |e 911400PK139267123  |k 0/910000/  |k 1/910000/911400/  |p 5 
998 |g 1032367881  |a Böckler, Dittmar  |m 1032367881:Böckler, Dittmar  |d 910000  |d 910200  |e 910000PB1032367881  |e 910200PB1032367881  |k 0/910000/  |k 1/910000/910200/  |p 4 
998 |g 1152848607  |a Schulz, Christof  |m 1152848607:Schulz, Christof  |d 910000  |d 910200  |e 910000PS1152848607  |e 910200PS1152848607  |k 0/910000/  |k 1/910000/910200/  |p 3 
998 |g 130138061  |a Geisbüsch, Philipp  |m 130138061:Geisbüsch, Philipp  |d 910000  |d 910200  |e 910000PG130138061  |e 910200PG130138061  |k 0/910000/  |k 1/910000/910200/ 
998 |g 1172688753  |a Steuwe, Andrea  |m 1172688753:Steuwe, Andrea  |d 910000  |d 911400  |e 910000PS1172688753  |e 911400PS1172688753  |k 0/910000/  |k 1/910000/911400/  |p 1  |x j 
999 |a KXP-PPN1584741848  |e 3036385622 
BIB |a Y 
SER |a journal 
JSO |a {"name":{"displayForm":["Andrea Steuwe, Philipp Geisbüsch, Christof J. Schulz, Dittmar Böckler, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, and Wolfram Stiller"]},"id":{"eki":["1584741848"],"doi":["10.1177/1526602816649588"]},"physDesc":[{"extent":"10 S."}],"recId":"1584741848","person":[{"given":"Andrea","role":"aut","family":"Steuwe","display":"Steuwe, Andrea"},{"display":"Geisbüsch, Philipp","given":"Philipp","role":"aut","family":"Geisbüsch"},{"family":"Schulz","given":"Christof","role":"aut","display":"Schulz, Christof"},{"role":"aut","given":"Dittmar","family":"Böckler","display":"Böckler, Dittmar"},{"display":"Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich","family":"Kauczor","given":"Hans-Ulrich","role":"aut"},{"display":"Stiller, Wolfram","family":"Stiller","given":"Wolfram","role":"aut"}],"relHost":[{"recId":"330217410","physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"disp":"Comparison of radiation exposure associated with intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography and follow-up multidetector computed tomography Angiography for evaluating endovascular aneurysm repairsJournal of endovascular therapy","origin":[{"publisher":"Sage ; International Society of Endovascular Specialists","dateIssuedDisp":"2000-","dateIssuedKey":"2000","publisherPlace":"Thousand Oaks, Calif. ; Phoenix, Ariz."}],"title":[{"subtitle":"an official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists","title":"Journal of endovascular therapy","title_sort":"Journal of endovascular therapy"}],"note":["Gesehen am 30.09.22"],"language":["eng"],"type":{"bibl":"periodical","media":"Online-Ressource"},"pubHistory":["Volume 7, no. 1 (February 2000)-"],"corporate":[{"role":"isb","display":"International Society of Endovascular Specialists"}],"part":{"issue":"4","extent":"10","text":"23(2016), 4, Seite 583-592","pages":"583-592","volume":"23","year":"2016"},"id":{"zdb":["2049858-5"],"eki":["330217410"],"issn":["1545-1550"]}}],"origin":[{"dateIssuedKey":"2016","dateIssuedDisp":"18 May 2016"}],"note":["Gesehen am 03.12.2018"],"language":["eng"],"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"article-journal"},"title":[{"title":"Comparison of radiation exposure associated with intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography and follow-up multidetector computed tomography Angiography for evaluating endovascular aneurysm repairs","title_sort":"Comparison of radiation exposure associated with intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography and follow-up multidetector computed tomography Angiography for evaluating endovascular aneurysm repairs"}]} 
SRT |a STEUWEANDRCOMPARISON1820