Why it pays for aid recipients to take note of the Millennium Challenge Corporation: other donors do!
We empirically analyze how other aid agencies, within and outside the United States, reacted to the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC). We find that positive signaling effects dominate possible substitution effects. Striving for MCC eligibility thus pays.
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
June 2012
|
| In: |
Economics letters
Year: 2012, Volume: 115, Issue: 3, Pages: 373-375 |
| ISSN: | 0165-1765 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.12.058 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.12.058 Verlag, Volltext: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165176511005817 
|
| Author Notes: | Axel Dreher, Peter Nunnenkamp, Hannes Öhler |
| Summary: | We empirically analyze how other aid agencies, within and outside the United States, reacted to the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC). We find that positive signaling effects dominate possible substitution effects. Striving for MCC eligibility thus pays. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 17.12.2018 Available online: 29 December 2011 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 0165-1765 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.12.058 |