Cover Image

International Dispute Settlement: Room for Innovations?

Show other versions (1)

This publication succeeds previously published seminars of the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law (Heidelberg, Germany) dealing with evolving principles and new developments in international law. Due to the limits of traditional dispute settlement in international...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Author)
Other Authors: Gätzschmann, Ina (Other)
Format: Conference Paper
Language:English
Published: Berlin Heidelberg Springer 2013
Series:Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht, Veröffentlichungen des Max-Planck-Instituts für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 239
SpringerLink Bücher
Volumes / Articles: Show Volumes / Articles.
DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-34967-6
Subjects:
Konferenzschrift > 2010 > Heidelberg
Streiterledigung
Internationaler Konflikt
World Trade Organization
Online Access:Verlag, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34967-6
Resolving-System, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34967-6
Cover: https://swbplus.bsz-bw.de/bsz377595799cov.jpg
Inhaltsverzeichnis: https://swbplus.bsz-bw.de/bsz377882976inh.htm
Verlag, Inhaltstext: http://deposit.dnb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?id=4164549&prov=M&dok_var=1&dok_ext=htm
Get full text
Author Notes:edited by Rüdiger Wolfrum, Ina Gätzschmann
Table of Contents:
  • International Dispute Settlement: Room for Innovations?; Acknowledgements; Table of Contents; Abbreviations; Opening Address; Panel I: What Makes the WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure Particular: Lessons to be Learned for the Settlement of International Disputes in General?; What Makes the WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure Particular: Lessons to be Learned for the Settlement of International Disputes in General?; Presentation by David Unterhalter; Comment by Georges Abi-Saab; Discussion; Panel II: Advisory Opinions: Are they a Suitable Alternative for the Settlement of International Disputes?
  • Advisory Opinions: Are they a Suitable Alternative for the Settlement of International Disputes?Presentation by Rüdiger Wolfrum; I. Introduction; II. The Various Procedures - An Overview; 1. Procedure before the International Court of Justice; a. Jurisdiction; b. Discretion; c. Advisory Opinions Provided for in Other International Agreements; 2. Procedure before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea/ the Seabed Dispute Chamber; a. Seabed Disputes Chamber; aa) Jurisdiction; bb) Admissibility; cc) Procedural Rules; b. Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
  • c. Procedure under Art. 188 of the Conventiond. Critique; 3. Procedure before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights; III. The Procedure for Delivering an Advisory Opinion; IV. Relevance of Advisory Opinions: Some Preliminary Observations; V. Conclusions, Advantages, Disadvantages; 1. Wide Participation of States and of International Organizations and Entities such as the Kosovo; 2. Adequateness for Multilateral Agreements; 3. Lack of Consent; 4. Urgent Procedure; 5. Disadvantage: Not Binding - Does it really Make such a Difference?; Comment by Pierre-Marie Dupuy
  • I. Advantages and Disadvantages of Advisory OpinionsII. The Practice of the Court; Comment by Alena F. Douhan; Advisory Opinions of the Economic Court of the Commonwealth of Independent States: A New Means of Settlement of International Disputes in the Region?; I. Advisory Opinion: Notions and Characteristics; 1. Historical and Conceptual Background; 2. Characteristics of Advisory Opinions; a. Applicants; b. Legal Nature of the Question; c. Relationship to International Disputes; d. Abstractness of Advisory Opinions; e. Legal Force of Advisory Opinions
  • II. Advisory Opinions of the CIS Economic Court1. CIS Legal System; 2. Non-inherent Right to Interpret - Historical Background on the CIS Economic Court's Right to Interpret; 3. CIS Economic Court Acts as Advisory Opinions; a. Jurisdiction; b. Applicants; c. Legal Question; d. Existence of an International Dispute; e. Abstractness of the Request; f. Legal Force of Interpretative Acts; g. Abstractness of Interpretative Decisions and Advisory Opinions; h. Forms of Acts; i. Advisory Opinions as a Means of Settlement of International Disputes
  • 4. CIS Economic Court's Interpretative Acts - Dispute Settlement Effect

Similar Items