Cooperation in public good games. Calculated or confused?

Some recent experimental papers have claimed that contribution decisions in a public goods game (PGG) are more likely to be cooperative if based on intuition rather than reflection. In light of conflicting findings, this paper (i) reinvestigates the behavioral impact of so-called cognitive style in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Goeschl, Timo (VerfasserIn) , Lohse, Johannes (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 15 June 2018
In: European economic review
Year: 2018, Jahrgang: 107, Pages: 185-203
ISSN:1873-572X
DOI:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.05.007
Online-Zugang:Verlag, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.05.007
Verlag, Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292118300850
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Timo Goeschl, Johannes Lohse

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1665031956
003 DE-627
005 20220816145954.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190509s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.05.007  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1665031956 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1665031956 
035 |a (OCoLC)1341212557 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 17  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Goeschl, Timo  |d 1970-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)141854138  |0 (DE-627)632449721  |0 (DE-576)326488928  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Cooperation in public good games. Calculated or confused?  |c Timo Goeschl, Johannes Lohse 
264 1 |c 15 June 2018 
300 |a 19 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Gesehen am 09.05.2019 
520 |a Some recent experimental papers have claimed that contribution decisions in a public goods game (PGG) are more likely to be cooperative if based on intuition rather than reflection. In light of conflicting findings, this paper (i) reinvestigates the behavioral impact of so-called cognitive style in the PGG; and (ii) connects it with an earlier literature on the role of cognitive failure (confusion). This is motivated by the possibility that the method of time pressure, commonly used to identify cognitive style, invites confusion as a confounding factor. Two channels for such confounds are identified and experimentally tested: A heterogeneous treatment effect of time pressure depending on subjects’ confusion status and a direct impact of time pressure on subjects’ likelihood of being confused. Our reinvestigation of the behavioral impact of time pressure confirms that cognitive style matters, but that deliberation rather than intuition drives cooperation. The confounding effect of confusion is not found to be direct, but to operate through a heterogeneous treatment effect. Time pressure selectively reduces average contributions among those subjects whose contributions can confidently be interpreted as cooperative rather than confused. 
650 4 |a Confusion 
650 4 |a Cooperation 
650 4 |a Experiment 
650 4 |a Public goods games 
650 4 |a Time pressure 
700 1 |a Lohse, Johannes  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1052230067  |0 (DE-627)788034308  |0 (DE-576)407984011  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t European economic review  |d Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1969  |g 107(2018), Seite 185-203  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)253781558  |w (DE-600)1460589-2  |w (DE-576)072794283  |x 1873-572X  |7 nnas  |a Cooperation in public good games. Calculated or confused? 
773 1 8 |g volume:107  |g year:2018  |g pages:185-203  |g extent:19  |a Cooperation in public good games. Calculated or confused? 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.05.007  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292118300850  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
992 |a 20190509 
993 |a Article 
994 |a 2018 
998 |g 141854138  |a Goeschl, Timo  |m 141854138:Goeschl, Timo  |d 180000  |d 181000  |e 180000PG141854138  |e 181000PG141854138  |k 0/180000/  |k 1/180000/181000/  |p 1  |x j 
999 |a KXP-PPN1665031956  |e 3472337893 
BIB |a Y 
SER |a journal 
JSO |a {"recId":"1665031956","note":["Gesehen am 09.05.2019"],"type":{"bibl":"article-journal","media":"Online-Ressource"},"title":[{"title_sort":"Cooperation in public good games. Calculated or confused?","title":"Cooperation in public good games. Calculated or confused?"}],"language":["eng"],"person":[{"display":"Goeschl, Timo","given":"Timo","role":"aut","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","family":"Goeschl"},{"family":"Lohse","display":"Lohse, Johannes","given":"Johannes","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","role":"aut"}],"relHost":[{"id":{"eki":["253781558"],"zdb":["1460589-2"],"issn":["1873-572X"]},"titleAlt":[{"title":"EER"}],"note":["Gesehen am 30.11.09"],"part":{"pages":"185-203","extent":"19","year":"2018","text":"107(2018), Seite 185-203","volume":"107"},"recId":"253781558","type":{"bibl":"periodical","media":"Online-Ressource"},"pubHistory":["1.1969/70 -"],"title":[{"subtitle":"EER","title":"European economic review","title_sort":"European economic review"}],"disp":"Cooperation in public good games. Calculated or confused?European economic review","language":["eng"],"name":{"displayForm":["European Scientific Association of Applied Economics"]},"origin":[{"publisherPlace":"Amsterdam ; Amsterdam","dateIssuedKey":"1969","publisher":"Elsevier ; North Holland Publ.","dateIssuedDisp":"1969-"}],"physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}]}],"name":{"displayForm":["Timo Goeschl, Johannes Lohse"]},"id":{"eki":["1665031956"],"doi":["10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.05.007"]},"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"15 June 2018","dateIssuedKey":"2018"}],"physDesc":[{"extent":"19 S."}]} 
SRT |a GOESCHLTIMCOOPERATIO1520