Establishing causation in climate litigation: admissibility and reliability

Climate litigation has attracted renewed interest as a governance tool. A key challenge in climate litigation is to assess the factual basis of causation. Extreme weather attribution, specifically the Fraction of Attributable Risk (FAR), has been proposed as a way to tackle this challenge. What rema...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Pfrommer, Tobias (VerfasserIn) , Goeschl, Timo (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 4 January 2019
In: Climatic change
Year: 2019, Jahrgang: 152, Heft: 1, Pages: 67-84
ISSN:1573-1480
DOI:10.1007/s10584-018-2362-4
Online-Zugang:Verlag, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2362-4
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Tobias Pfrommer, Timo Goeschl, Alexander Proelss, Martin Carrier, Johannes Lenhard, Henrike Martin, Ulrike Niemeier, Hauke Schmidt

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1665811625
003 DE-627
005 20220816153649.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190516s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10584-018-2362-4  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1665811625 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1665811625 
035 |a (OCoLC)1341224874 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 33  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Pfrommer, Tobias  |d 1983-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1075619874  |0 (DE-627)833554360  |0 (DE-576)444419004  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Establishing causation in climate litigation  |b admissibility and reliability  |c Tobias Pfrommer, Timo Goeschl, Alexander Proelss, Martin Carrier, Johannes Lenhard, Henrike Martin, Ulrike Niemeier, Hauke Schmidt 
264 1 |c 4 January 2019 
300 |a 18 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Gesehen am 17.05.2019 
520 |a Climate litigation has attracted renewed interest as a governance tool. A key challenge in climate litigation is to assess the factual basis of causation. Extreme weather attribution, specifically the Fraction of Attributable Risk (FAR), has been proposed as a way to tackle this challenge. What remains unclear is how attribution science interacts with the legal admissibility of evidence based on climate models. While evidence has to be legally admissible in order to be considered in a trial, it has to be reliable in order for the court to arrive at a legally correct conclusion. Since parties to the trial have incentives to produce evidence favorable to their case, admissibility requirements and the reliability of the evidence brought forward are linked. We provide a specific proposal for how to accommodate FAR estimates in admissibility standards by modifying an existing set of admissibility criteria, the Daubert criteria. We argue that two of the five Daubert criteria are unsuitable for dealing with such evidence and that replacing those criteria with ones directly addressing the reliability of FAR estimates is adequate. Lastly, we highlight the dependence of courts on both the existence and accessibility of a framework to determine the reliability of FAR estimates in executing such criteria. 
700 1 |a Goeschl, Timo  |d 1970-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)141854138  |0 (DE-627)632449721  |0 (DE-576)326488928  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Climatic change  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1977  |g 152(2019), 1, Seite 67-84  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270429514  |w (DE-600)1477652-2  |w (DE-576)102668949  |x 1573-1480  |7 nnas  |a Establishing causation in climate litigation admissibility and reliability 
773 1 8 |g volume:152  |g year:2019  |g number:1  |g pages:67-84  |g extent:18  |a Establishing causation in climate litigation admissibility and reliability 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2362-4  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
992 |a 20190516 
993 |a Article 
994 |a 2019 
998 |g 141854138  |a Goeschl, Timo  |m 141854138:Goeschl, Timo  |d 180000  |d 181000  |e 180000PG141854138  |e 181000PG141854138  |k 0/180000/  |k 1/180000/181000/  |p 2 
998 |g 1075619874  |a Pfrommer, Tobias  |m 1075619874:Pfrommer, Tobias  |d 180000  |d 181000  |e 180000PP1075619874  |e 181000PP1075619874  |k 0/180000/  |k 1/180000/181000/  |p 1  |x j 
999 |a KXP-PPN1665811625  |e 3476511227 
BIB |a Y 
SER |a journal 
JSO |a {"origin":[{"dateIssuedKey":"2019","dateIssuedDisp":"4 January 2019"}],"relHost":[{"disp":"Establishing causation in climate litigation admissibility and reliabilityClimatic change","physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"recId":"270429514","language":["eng"],"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"periodical"},"note":["Gesehen am 20.04.17"],"id":{"issn":["1573-1480"],"eki":["270429514"],"zdb":["1477652-2"]},"title":[{"title":"Climatic change","title_sort":"Climatic change","subtitle":"an interdisciplinary, international journal devoted to the description, causes and implications of climatic change"}],"part":{"pages":"67-84","extent":"18","text":"152(2019), 1, Seite 67-84","issue":"1","year":"2019","volume":"152"},"origin":[{"dateIssuedKey":"1977","publisherPlace":"Dordrecht [u.a.] ; Dordrecht [u.a.]","dateIssuedDisp":"1977-","publisher":"Springer Science + Business Media B.V ; Kluwer"}],"pubHistory":["1.1977/78 -"]}],"person":[{"role":"aut","given":"Tobias","family":"Pfrommer","display":"Pfrommer, Tobias"},{"display":"Goeschl, Timo","family":"Goeschl","given":"Timo","role":"aut"}],"title":[{"title":"Establishing causation in climate litigation","title_sort":"Establishing causation in climate litigation","subtitle":"admissibility and reliability"}],"language":["eng"],"type":{"bibl":"article-journal","media":"Online-Ressource"},"note":["Gesehen am 17.05.2019"],"recId":"1665811625","physDesc":[{"extent":"18 S."}],"name":{"displayForm":["Tobias Pfrommer, Timo Goeschl, Alexander Proelss, Martin Carrier, Johannes Lenhard, Henrike Martin, Ulrike Niemeier, Hauke Schmidt"]},"id":{"eki":["1665811625"],"doi":["10.1007/s10584-018-2362-4"]}} 
SRT |a PFROMMERTOESTABLISHI4201