Brain signal variability differentially affects cognitive flexibility and cognitive stability

Recent research yielded the intriguing conclusion that, in healthy adults, higher levels of variability in neuronal processes are beneficial for cognitive functioning. Beneficial effects of variability in neuronal processing can also be inferred from neurocomputational theories of working memory, al...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Armbruster-Genç, Diana J. N. (VerfasserIn) , Ueltzhöffer, Kai (VerfasserIn) , Fiebach, Christian (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 6 April 2016
In: The journal of neuroscience
Year: 2016, Jahrgang: 36, Heft: 14, Pages: 3978-3987
ISSN:1529-2401
DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2517-14.2016
Online-Zugang:Verlag, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2517-14.2016
Verlag, Volltext: http://www.jneurosci.org/content/36/14/3978
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Diana J.N. Armbruster-Genç, Kai Ueltzhöffer, and Christian J. Fiebach

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1666138452
003 DE-627
005 20220816160210.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190522s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2517-14.2016  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1666138452 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1666138452 
035 |a (OCoLC)1341225337 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 33  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Armbruster-Genç, Diana J. N.  |d 1984-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1054346437  |0 (DE-627)791350770  |0 (DE-576)410175498  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Brain signal variability differentially affects cognitive flexibility and cognitive stability  |c Diana J.N. Armbruster-Genç, Kai Ueltzhöffer, and Christian J. Fiebach 
264 1 |c 6 April 2016 
300 |a 10 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Gesehen am 22.05.2019 
520 |a Recent research yielded the intriguing conclusion that, in healthy adults, higher levels of variability in neuronal processes are beneficial for cognitive functioning. Beneficial effects of variability in neuronal processing can also be inferred from neurocomputational theories of working memory, albeit this holds only for tasks requiring cognitive flexibility. However, cognitive stability, i.e., the ability to maintain a task goal in the face of irrelevant distractors, should suffer under high levels of brain signal variability. To directly test this prediction, we studied both behavioral and brain signal variability during cognitive flexibility (i.e., task switching) and cognitive stability (i.e., distractor inhibition) in a sample of healthy human subjects and developed an efficient and easy-to-implement analysis approach to assess BOLD-signal variability in event-related fMRI task paradigms. Results show a general positive effect of neural variability on task performance as assessed by accuracy measures. However, higher levels of BOLD-signal variability in the left inferior frontal junction area result in reduced error rate costs during task switching and thus facilitate cognitive flexibility. In contrast, variability in the same area has a detrimental effect on cognitive stability, as shown in a negative effect of variability on response time costs during distractor inhibition. This pattern was mirrored at the behavioral level, with higher behavioral variability predicting better task switching but worse distractor inhibition performance. Our data extend previous results on brain signal variability by showing a differential effect of brain signal variability that depends on task context, in line with predictions from computational theories. - SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Recent neuroscientific research showed that the human brain signal is intrinsically variable and suggested that this variability improves performance. Computational models of prefrontal neural networks predict differential effects of variability for different behavioral situations requiring either cognitive flexibility or stability. However, this hypothesis has so far not been put to an empirical test. In this study, we assessed cognitive flexibility and cognitive stability, and, besides a generally positive effect of neural variability on accuracy measures, we show that neural variability in a prefrontal brain area at the inferior frontal junction is differentially associated with performance: higher levels of variability are beneficial for the effectiveness of task switching (cognitive flexibility) but detrimental for the efficiency of distractor inhibition (cognitive stability). 
650 4 |a behavioral variability 
650 4 |a BOLD-signal variability 
650 4 |a cognitive flexibility 
650 4 |a cognitive stability 
650 4 |a fMRI 
700 1 |a Ueltzhöffer, Kai  |d 1985-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1116632047  |0 (DE-627)870587773  |0 (DE-576)478539207  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Fiebach, Christian  |d 1971-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)123945526  |0 (DE-627)085540927  |0 (DE-576)185516505  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The journal of neuroscience  |d Washington, DC : Soc., 1981  |g 36(2016), 14, Seite 3978-3987  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)269536906  |w (DE-600)1475274-8  |w (DE-576)078590124  |x 1529-2401  |7 nnas  |a Brain signal variability differentially affects cognitive flexibility and cognitive stability 
773 1 8 |g volume:36  |g year:2016  |g number:14  |g pages:3978-3987  |g extent:10  |a Brain signal variability differentially affects cognitive flexibility and cognitive stability 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2517-14.2016  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://www.jneurosci.org/content/36/14/3978  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
992 |a 20190522 
993 |a Article 
994 |a 2016 
998 |g 123945526  |a Fiebach, Christian  |m 123945526:Fiebach, Christian  |p 3  |y j 
998 |g 1116632047  |a Ueltzhöffer, Kai  |m 1116632047:Ueltzhöffer, Kai  |d 50000  |e 50000PU1116632047  |k 0/50000/  |p 2 
999 |a KXP-PPN1666138452  |e 3478932483 
BIB |a Y 
SER |a journal 
JSO |a {"person":[{"family":"Armbruster-Genç","given":"Diana J. N.","display":"Armbruster-Genç, Diana J. N.","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","role":"aut"},{"display":"Ueltzhöffer, Kai","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","role":"aut","family":"Ueltzhöffer","given":"Kai"},{"given":"Christian","family":"Fiebach","role":"aut","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","display":"Fiebach, Christian"}],"title":[{"title":"Brain signal variability differentially affects cognitive flexibility and cognitive stability","title_sort":"Brain signal variability differentially affects cognitive flexibility and cognitive stability"}],"type":{"bibl":"article-journal","media":"Online-Ressource"},"note":["Gesehen am 22.05.2019"],"language":["eng"],"recId":"1666138452","name":{"displayForm":["Diana J.N. Armbruster-Genç, Kai Ueltzhöffer, and Christian J. Fiebach"]},"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"6 April 2016","dateIssuedKey":"2016"}],"id":{"doi":["10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2517-14.2016"],"eki":["1666138452"]},"physDesc":[{"extent":"10 S."}],"relHost":[{"physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"id":{"issn":["1529-2401"],"eki":["269536906"],"zdb":["1475274-8"]},"origin":[{"publisher":"Soc.","dateIssuedKey":"1981","dateIssuedDisp":"1981-","publisherPlace":"Washington, DC"}],"part":{"pages":"3978-3987","issue":"14","year":"2016","extent":"10","volume":"36","text":"36(2016), 14, Seite 3978-3987"},"titleAlt":[{"title":"Neuroscience"},{"title":"JNeurosci"}],"pubHistory":["1.1981 -"],"recId":"269536906","language":["eng"],"corporate":[{"roleDisplay":"Herausgebendes Organ","display":"Society for Neuroscience","role":"isb"}],"note":["Fortsetzung der Druck-Ausgabe","Gesehen am 07.11.2022"],"disp":"Brain signal variability differentially affects cognitive flexibility and cognitive stabilityThe journal of neuroscience","type":{"bibl":"periodical","media":"Online-Ressource"},"title":[{"title":"The journal of neuroscience","subtitle":"the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience","title_sort":"journal of neuroscience"}]}]} 
SRT |a ARMBRUSTERBRAINSIGNA6201