First experiences with the Airo mobile intraoperative CT scanner in acetabular surgery - an analysis of 10 cases

Background: Being a proven method in trauma and spine surgery, intraoperative 3D imaging (CBCT) has intrinsic deficits in difficult anatomy and with artifacts because of metal implants. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) in acetabular surger...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Keil, Holger (VerfasserIn) , Beisemann, Nils (VerfasserIn) , Schnetzke, Marc (VerfasserIn) , Vetter, Sven Y. (VerfasserIn) , Grützner, Paul Alfred (VerfasserIn) , Franke, Jochen (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 02 February 2019
In: The international journal of medical robotics and computer assisted surgery
Year: 2019, Jahrgang: 15, Heft: 2, Pages: e1986
ISSN:1478-596X
DOI:10.1002/rcs.1986
Online-Zugang:Verlag, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1986
Verlag, Volltext: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/rcs.1986
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Holger Keil, Nils Beisemann, Marc Schnetzke, Sven Y. Vetter, Paul A. Grützner, Jochen Franke
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Being a proven method in trauma and spine surgery, intraoperative 3D imaging (CBCT) has intrinsic deficits in difficult anatomy and with artifacts because of metal implants. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) in acetabular surgery. Methods: Ten cases of acetabular fractures that were operated with intraoperative use of the mobile CT scanner Brainlab Airo were analyzed. Data were compared with a historical group of 17 patients. Results: Additional fluoroscopy time was 24.2 seconds (6-91), which was significantly lower than in the control group where it was 211.4 seconds (77-446; P < 0.000). Operation time did not differ significantly (iCT group 196.8 min [122-288], control group 240.8 min [71-411], P = 0.234). Conclusion: iCT provides images of a reliable high quality and assessability. Radiation exposure to the staff is reduced while surgery time is not altered significantly. Quality of intraoperative imaging and thus patient care can substantially improve patient outcome.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 24.05.2019
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1478-596X
DOI:10.1002/rcs.1986