Buchumschlag

Double-balloon catheter and sequential oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term: a retrospective cohort study

Objective - To evaluate the efficacy of induction of labour using a double-balloon catheter and, if necessary, sequential oral misoprostol without delay after removal of the catheter, in comparison with oral misoprostol alone. - Study design - This retrospective cohort study included women undergoin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Kehl, Sven (VerfasserIn) , Weiß, Christel (VerfasserIn) , Sütterlin, Marc (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: September 2016
In: European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology
Year: 2016, Jahrgang: 204, Pages: 78-82
ISSN:1872-7654
DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507
Online-Zugang:Verlag, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507
Verlag, Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211516308399
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Sven Kehl, Christel Weiss, Ulf Dammer, Jutta Heimrich, Matthias W. Beckmann, Florian Faschingbauer, Marc Sütterlin

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1670688933
003 DE-627
005 20220816203449.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190806s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1670688933 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1670688933 
035 |a (OCoLC)1341235481 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 33  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Kehl, Sven  |d 1978-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)130859184  |0 (DE-627)506776980  |0 (DE-576)250757486  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Double-balloon catheter and sequential oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term  |b a retrospective cohort study  |c Sven Kehl, Christel Weiss, Ulf Dammer, Jutta Heimrich, Matthias W. Beckmann, Florian Faschingbauer, Marc Sütterlin 
264 1 |c September 2016 
300 |a 5 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Gesehen am 06.08.2019 
500 |a Available online 4 August 2016 
520 |a Objective - To evaluate the efficacy of induction of labour using a double-balloon catheter and, if necessary, sequential oral misoprostol without delay after removal of the catheter, in comparison with oral misoprostol alone. - Study design - This retrospective cohort study included women undergoing induction of labour with oral misoprostol or double-balloon catheter with sequential oral misoprostol in singleton pregnancies at term. The catheter was placed in the evening and removed when there was no onset of labour within 12h. Then oral misoprostol was started within 3h. Primary outcome measure was the caesarean section rate. - Results - There were 13,082 deliveries during the study period with 3466 labour inductions out of which 1032 were eligible and analysed. The caesarean section rate was significantly lower in the double-balloon catheter group (26.1% vs. 17.3, p=0.021). Furthermore, in the combination group, the induction-to-delivery interval was shorter (median values 1144 vs. 1365min, p=0.001) and there were more deliveries within 24h (51.9 vs. 64.7%, p=0.003) and 48h (87.4 vs. 95.8%, p=0.002). When stratifying for parity, there were less caesarean sections in the combination group (37.2% vs. 24.2%, p=0.015) in nulliparous women, too. In both, nulliparous and parous women, the induction-to-delivery interval was shorter (1742 vs. 1400min, 0.005; 1020 vs. 912min, p=0.018). Especially in parous women, the rates of delivery within 24h (62.6% vs. 79.0%, p=0.007) and 48h (88.6% vs. 99.0%, p=0.007) were higher in the combination group. - Conclusion - Double-balloon catheter and sequential oral misoprostol without long delay in absent onset of labour after removal of the catheter resulted in less caesarean section and shorter induction-to-delivery interval in comparison with oral misoprostol alone. 
650 4 |a Cervical ripening 
650 4 |a Cervical ripening balloon 
650 4 |a Double-balloon catheter 
650 4 |a Induction of labour 
650 4 |a Misoprostol 
650 4 |a Sequential use 
700 1 |a Weiß, Christel  |d 1958-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)123287707  |0 (DE-627)082463417  |0 (DE-576)168356104  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sütterlin, Marc  |d 1967-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)102644067X  |0 (DE-627)72673389X  |0 (DE-576)371782651  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology  |d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1973  |g 204(2016), Seite 78-82  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320443469  |w (DE-600)2005196-7  |w (DE-576)094142106  |x 1872-7654  |7 nnas  |a Double-balloon catheter and sequential oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term a retrospective cohort study 
773 1 8 |g volume:204  |g year:2016  |g pages:78-82  |g extent:5  |a Double-balloon catheter and sequential oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term a retrospective cohort study 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211516308399  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
992 |a 20190806 
993 |a Article 
994 |a 2016 
998 |g 102644067X  |a Sütterlin, Marc  |m 102644067X:Sütterlin, Marc  |d 60000  |d 61300  |e 60000PS102644067X  |e 61300PS102644067X  |k 0/60000/  |k 1/60000/61300/  |p 7  |y j 
998 |g 123287707  |a Weiß, Christel  |m 123287707:Weiß, Christel  |d 60000  |d 60200  |d 60250  |e 60000PW123287707  |e 60200PW123287707  |e 60250PW123287707  |k 0/60000/  |k 1/60000/60200/  |k 2/60000/60200/60250/  |p 2 
999 |a KXP-PPN1670688933  |e 3504719044 
BIB |a Y 
SER |a journal 
JSO |a {"person":[{"given":"Sven","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","role":"aut","family":"Kehl","display":"Kehl, Sven"},{"given":"Christel","display":"Weiß, Christel","family":"Weiß","role":"aut","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn"},{"given":"Marc","role":"aut","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","family":"Sütterlin","display":"Sütterlin, Marc"}],"relHost":[{"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"1973-","publisher":"Elsevier Science","dateIssuedKey":"1973","publisherPlace":"Amsterdam [u.a.]"}],"physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"part":{"text":"204(2016), Seite 78-82","year":"2016","extent":"5","pages":"78-82","volume":"204"},"pubHistory":["3.1973 -"],"type":{"bibl":"periodical","media":"Online-Ressource"},"language":["eng"],"title":[{"title":"European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology","subtitle":"the official journal of the European Association of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (EAGO) & the European College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG)","title_sort":"European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology"}],"disp":"Double-balloon catheter and sequential oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term a retrospective cohort studyEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology","recId":"320443469","id":{"eki":["320443469"],"zdb":["2005196-7"],"issn":["1872-7654"]},"note":["Gesehen am 20.11.24","Ungezählte Beil.: Supplement"]}],"recId":"1670688933","id":{"doi":["10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507"],"eki":["1670688933"]},"note":["Gesehen am 06.08.2019","Available online 4 August 2016"],"name":{"displayForm":["Sven Kehl, Christel Weiss, Ulf Dammer, Jutta Heimrich, Matthias W. Beckmann, Florian Faschingbauer, Marc Sütterlin"]},"language":["eng"],"title":[{"title_sort":"Double-balloon catheter and sequential oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term","subtitle":"a retrospective cohort study","title":"Double-balloon catheter and sequential oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term"}],"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"article-journal"},"origin":[{"dateIssuedKey":"2016","dateIssuedDisp":"September 2016"}],"physDesc":[{"extent":"5 S."}]} 
SRT |a KEHLSVENWEDOUBLEBALL2016 

Ähnliche Einträge