Buchumschlag

The single mandibular implant study: short-term effects of the loading protocol on Oral Health-related Quality of Life

Purpose - A single implant can be placed to retain an overdenture in the edentulous mandible. This study aimed at the development of Oral Health-related Quality of Life comparing immediate and delayed implant loading, i.e., loading after 3 months of submerged healing. - Methods - In a randomized con...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Schwindling, Franz Sebastian (VerfasserIn) , Rädel, Michael (VerfasserIn) , Passia, Nicole (VerfasserIn) , Freitag-Wolf, Sandra (VerfasserIn) , Wolfart, Stefan (VerfasserIn) , Att, Wael (VerfasserIn) , Mundt, Torsten (VerfasserIn) , Reißmann, Daniel R. (VerfasserIn) , Ismail, Fadi (VerfasserIn) , von Königsmark, Valerie (VerfasserIn) , Kern, Matthias (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 7 May 2018
In: Journal of prosthodontic research
Year: 2018, Jahrgang: 62, Heft: 3, Pages: 313-316
ISSN:1883-1958
DOI:10.1016/j.jpor.2017.12.003
Online-Zugang:Verlag, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.12.003
Verlag, Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1883195817301391
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Franz Sebastian Schwindling, Michael Raedel, Nicole Passia, Sandra Freitag-Wolf, Stefan Wolfart, Wael Att, Torsten Mundt, Daniel Reissmann, Fadi Ismail, Valerie von Königsmark, Matthias Kern
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose - A single implant can be placed to retain an overdenture in the edentulous mandible. This study aimed at the development of Oral Health-related Quality of Life comparing immediate and delayed implant loading, i.e., loading after 3 months of submerged healing. - Methods - In a randomized controlled trial, 158 participants received a single mandibular implant in the midline. Quality of life was measured using the summary score of the German 49-item Oral Health Impact Profile at baseline, one month after implant placement (direct loading group) as well as one and four months after loading. - Results - Mean scores at baseline were comparable. Four months after implantation, a decrease of mean scores was recognized for both groups, indicating a significantly enhanced quality of life after treatment. When comparing the groups after both 1 and 4 months of loading, quality of life was insignificantly higher in the delayed loading group (1 month: 42.1 vs. 32.3; 4 months: 33.6 vs. 27.7). For immediate loading, an insignificant tendency to an earlier improvement was recognized (Δ1month-baseline: 9.7, compared to Δ1month-baseline: 6.4). - Conclusions - The single mandibular implant concept was associated with a positive impact on quality of life. However, no statistically significant influence of implant loading on quality of life was found.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 04.09.2019
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1883-1958
DOI:10.1016/j.jpor.2017.12.003

Ähnliche Einträge