Die persönliche Wahl des Geburtsmodus: wie entscheiden sich Urogynäkologinnen und Urogynäkologen? : erste Ergebnisse der DECISION-Studie
<p> <b>Introduction</b> Currently, almost every third child in Germany is delivered by caesarean section. Apart from straightforward and clear indications for caesarean section which account for approx. 10%, the large proportion of relative indications in particular needs to be cri...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | German |
| Published: |
27. November 2017
|
| In: |
Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde
Year: 2017, Volume: 77, Issue: 11, Pages: 1182-1188 |
| ISSN: | 1438-8804 |
| DOI: | 10.1055/s-0043-120919 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-120919 Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-0043-120919?articleLanguage=de 
|
| Author Notes: | Julia Bihler, Ralf Tunn, Christl Reisenauer, Jan Pauluschke-Fröhlich, Philipp Wagner, Harald Abele, Katharina K. Rall, Gert Naumann, Markus Wallwiener, Sara Y. Brucker, Markus Hübner |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 167771171X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220816232157.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190925s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||ger c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1055/s-0043-120919 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)167771171X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP167771171X | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1341244517 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a ger | ||
| 084 | |a 33 |2 sdnb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bihler, Julia |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1163279544 |0 (DE-627)1027484662 |0 (DE-576)507864778 |4 aut | |
| 240 | 1 | 0 | |a Personal preference of mode of delivery |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a Die persönliche Wahl des Geburtsmodus |b wie entscheiden sich Urogynäkologinnen und Urogynäkologen? : erste Ergebnisse der DECISION-Studie |c Julia Bihler, Ralf Tunn, Christl Reisenauer, Jan Pauluschke-Fröhlich, Philipp Wagner, Harald Abele, Katharina K. Rall, Gert Naumann, Markus Wallwiener, Sara Y. Brucker, Markus Hübner |
| 264 | 1 | |c 27. November 2017 | |
| 300 | |a 7 | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Publikationsdatum: 27. November 2017 (online) | ||
| 500 | |a Gesehen am 25.09.2019 | ||
| 520 | |a <p> <b>Introduction</b> Currently, almost every third child in Germany is delivered by caesarean section. Apart from straightforward and clear indications for caesarean section which account for approx. 10%, the large proportion of relative indications in particular needs to be critically reviewed if the current C-section rate is to be effectively lowered. It is more than doubtful, however, whether this can be a realistic goal in Germany, especially in the context of international developments. All studies on this topic demonstrate that the personal attitude of the obstetric team has a considerable influence on the pregnant womanʼs personally preferred mode of delivery. Therefore, in the first part of the DECISION study, the personal preferences of urogynaecologists were evaluated regarding the best suitable mode of delivery.</p> <p> <b>Material and Methods</b> All 432 delegates at the 9th German Urogynaecology Congress in Stuttgart in April 2017 were invited to participate in an online questionnaire study. The questionnaire was developed especially for this study.</p> <p> <b>Results</b> Of the 432 registered delegates, 189 (43.8%) participated in the survey. 84.7% (n = 160) of the study participants would prefer a vaginal delivery, in an otherwise uncomplicated pregnancy. Only 12.2% (n = 23) opted for an elective caesarean section. The main reasons stated for this decision were concerns about incontinence (87.5%) and pelvic floor trauma (79.2%). Amongst the study participants, 83.6% would like to be part of a risk stratification system presented in the questionnaire which, with the aid of specific parameters, is intended to allow early identification of a population with a high risk of developing pelvic floor disorders. There was also great interest in postpartum pelvic floor recovery (97.8%) and an associated optional pessary therapy (64.4%). The type of delivery already experienced (vaginal delivery vs. primary caesarean section) and parity also reveals to have a significant influence on the personal preferred mode of delivery as well.</p> <p> <b>Conclusions</b> Urogynaecologists prefer vaginal delivery for themselves. There is a great interest to participate in a risk stratification process in order to approach childbirth in an individualized and risk-adapted manner.</p> | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Wallwiener, Markus |d 1980- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)134044827 |0 (DE-627)692043934 |0 (DE-576)27468327X |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde |d Stuttgart : Thieme, 1980 |g 77(2017), 11, Seite 1182-1188 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)324451970 |w (DE-600)2026496-3 |w (DE-576)279447663 |x 1438-8804 |7 nnas |a Die persönliche Wahl des Geburtsmodus wie entscheiden sich Urogynäkologinnen und Urogynäkologen? : erste Ergebnisse der DECISION-Studie |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:77 |g year:2017 |g number:11 |g pages:1182-1188 |g extent:7 |a Die persönliche Wahl des Geburtsmodus wie entscheiden sich Urogynäkologinnen und Urogynäkologen? : erste Ergebnisse der DECISION-Studie |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-120919 |x Verlag |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-0043-120919?articleLanguage=de |x Verlag |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 992 | |a 20190925 | ||
| 993 | |a Article | ||
| 994 | |a 2017 | ||
| 998 | |g 134044827 |a Wallwiener, Markus |m 134044827:Wallwiener, Markus |d 910000 |d 910400 |e 910000PW134044827 |e 910400PW134044827 |k 0/910000/ |k 1/910000/910400/ |p 9 | ||
| 999 | |a KXP-PPN167771171X |e 3517911739 | ||
| BIB | |a Y | ||
| SER | |a journal | ||
| JSO | |a {"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"article-journal"},"titleUni":[{"title":"Personal preference of mode of delivery","title_sort":"Personal preference of mode of delivery"}],"language":["ger"],"note":["Publikationsdatum: 27. November 2017 (online)","Gesehen am 25.09.2019"],"physDesc":[{"extent":"7 S."}],"id":{"eki":["167771171X"],"doi":["10.1055/s-0043-120919"]},"title":[{"title":"Die persönliche Wahl des Geburtsmodus","subtitle":"wie entscheiden sich Urogynäkologinnen und Urogynäkologen? : erste Ergebnisse der DECISION-Studie","title_sort":"persönliche Wahl des Geburtsmodus"}],"origin":[{"dateIssuedKey":"2017","dateIssuedDisp":"27. November 2017"}],"relHost":[{"id":{"doi":["10.1055/s-00000020"],"zdb":["2026496-3"],"eki":["324451970"],"issn":["1438-8804"]},"physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"title":[{"title":"Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde","title_sort":"Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde"}],"origin":[{"publisher":"Thieme","dateIssuedDisp":"1980-","dateIssuedKey":"1980","publisherPlace":"Stuttgart ; New York, NY"}],"recId":"324451970","disp":"Die persönliche Wahl des Geburtsmodus wie entscheiden sich Urogynäkologinnen und Urogynäkologen? : erste Ergebnisse der DECISION-StudieGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde","type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"periodical"},"titleAlt":[{"title":"GEBFRA"}],"part":{"issue":"11","pages":"1182-1188","extent":"7","text":"77(2017), 11, Seite 1182-1188","year":"2017","volume":"77"},"language":["ger"],"pubHistory":["Nachgewiesen 40.1980 -"],"note":["Erscheint monatlich","Gesehen am 08.11.2024"]}],"name":{"displayForm":["Julia Bihler, Ralf Tunn, Christl Reisenauer, Jan Pauluschke-Fröhlich, Philipp Wagner, Harald Abele, Katharina K. Rall, Gert Naumann, Markus Wallwiener, Sara Y. Brucker, Markus Hübner"]},"person":[{"family":"Bihler","role":"aut","given":"Julia","display":"Bihler, Julia"},{"family":"Wallwiener","role":"aut","display":"Wallwiener, Markus","given":"Markus"}],"recId":"167771171X"} | ||
| SRT | |a BIHLERJULIPERSOENLIC2720 | ||