Non-invasive prenatal testing as a routine procedure of prenatal care: Perspectives and challenges regarding reproductive autonomy
In March 2019, the German Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (G‑BA; Federal Joint Committee) presented the result of the method assessment process on non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). The aim of this method assessment process was to decide whether NIPT should become a publicly funded procedure of routi...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
03 December 2019
|
| In: |
Ethik in der Medizin
Year: 2020, Jahrgang: 32, Heft: 1, Pages: 49-63 |
| ISSN: | 1437-1618 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00481-019-00555-0 |
| Online-Zugang: | Verlag, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00481-019-00555-0 Verlag, Volltext: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00481-019-00555-0 
|
| Verfasserangaben: | Giovanni Rubeis, Marcin Orzechowski, Florian Steger |
| Zusammenfassung: | In March 2019, the German Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (G‑BA; Federal Joint Committee) presented the result of the method assessment process on non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). The aim of this method assessment process was to decide whether NIPT should become a publicly funded procedure of routine prenatal care. The G‑BA decided in favor of NIPT, making the implementation of NIPT very likely, provided that other healthcare and political institutions also agree. |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Gesehen am 05.12.2019 |
| Beschreibung: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1437-1618 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00481-019-00555-0 |