Quo vadis CPS?: brief answers to big questions
Research on complex problem solving (CPS) has reached a stage where certain standards have been achieved, whereas the future development is quite ambiguous. In this situation, the editors of the Journal of Dynamic Decision Making asked a number of representative authors to share their point of view...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2019-12-31
|
| In: |
Journal of dynamic decision making
Year: 2019, Jahrgang: 5 |
| ISSN: | 2365-8037 |
| DOI: | 10.11588/jddm.2019.1.69302 |
| Online-Zugang: | Verlag, Volltext: http://dx.doi.org/10.11588/jddm.2019.1.69302 Verlag, Volltext: https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/jddm/article/view/69302/62664 
|
| Verfasserangaben: | Matthias Stadler and Samuel Greiff |
| Zusammenfassung: | Research on complex problem solving (CPS) has reached a stage where certain standards have been achieved, whereas the future development is quite ambiguous. In this situation, the editors of the Journal of Dynamic Decision Making asked a number of representative authors to share their point of view with respect to seven questions about the relevance of (complex) problem solving as a research area, about the contribution of laboratory-based CPS research to solving real life problems, about the roles of knowledge, strategies, and intuition in CPS, and about the existence of expertise in CPS. |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Gesehen am 22.01.2020 |
| Beschreibung: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 2365-8037 |
| DOI: | 10.11588/jddm.2019.1.69302 |