Options to reform the European Union legislation on GMOs - risk governance
Here, we discuss options to reform the EU genetically modified organism (GMO) regulatory framework, to make risk assessment and decision-making more consistent with scientific principles, and to lay the groundwork for international coherence. We discussed the scope and definitions in a previous arti...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
[April 2020]
|
| In: |
Trends in biotechnology
Year: 2020, Jahrgang: 38, Heft: 4, Pages: 349-351 |
| ISSN: | 1879-3096 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.016 |
| Online-Zugang: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.016 |
| Verfasserangaben: | Dennis Eriksson, Rene Custers, Karin Edvardsson Bjornberg, Sven Ove Hansson, Kai Purnhagen, Matin Qaim, Jorg Romeis, Joachim Schiemann, Stephan Schleissing, Jale Tosun, and Richard G.F. Visser |
| Zusammenfassung: | Here, we discuss options to reform the EU genetically modified organism (GMO) regulatory framework, to make risk assessment and decision-making more consistent with scientific principles, and to lay the groundwork for international coherence. We discussed the scope and definitions in a previous article and, thus, here we focus on the procedures for risk assessment and risk management. |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Gesehen am 16.04.2020 |
| Beschreibung: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1879-3096 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.016 |