Impact of computer-aided CT and PET analysis on non-invasive T staging in patients with lung cancer and atelectasis
PURPOSE: Tumor delineation within an atelectasis in lung cancer patients is not always accurate. When T staging is done by integrated 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computer tomography (CT), tumors of neuroendocrine differentiation and slowly grow...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
20 December 2018
|
| In: |
Molecular imaging & biology
Year: 2018, Volume: 20, Issue: 6, Pages: 1044-1052 |
| ISSN: | 1860-2002 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11307-018-1196-9 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-018-1196-9
|
| Author Notes: | Paul Flechsig, Ramin Rastgoo, Clemens Kratochwil, Ole Martin, Tim Holland-Letz, Alexander Harms, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Uwe Haberkorn & Frederik L. Giesel |
| Summary: | PURPOSE: Tumor delineation within an atelectasis in lung cancer patients is not always accurate. When T staging is done by integrated 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computer tomography (CT), tumors of neuroendocrine differentiation and slowly growing tumors can present with reduced FDG uptake, thus aggravating an exact T staging. In order to further exhaust information derived from [18F]FDG-PET/CT, we evaluated the impact of CT density and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for the classification of different tumor subtypes within a surrounding atelectasis, as well as possible cutoff values for the differentiation between the primary tumor and atelectatic lung tissue. - PROCEDURES: Seventy-two patients with histologically proven lung cancer and adjacent atelectasis were investigated. Non-contrast-enhanced [18F]FDG-PET/CT was performed within 2 weeks before surgery/biopsy. Boundaries of the primary within the atelectasis were determined visually on the basis of [18F]FDG uptake; CT density was quantified manually within each primary and each atelectasis. - RESULTS: CT density of the primary (36.4 Hounsfield units (HU) ± 6.2) was significantly higher compared to that of atelectatic lung (24.3 HU ± 8.3; p < 0.01), irrespective of the histological subtype. The discrimination between different malignant tumors using density analysis failed. SUVmax was increased in squamous cell carcinomas compared to adenocarcinomas. Irrespective of the malignant subtype, a possible cutoff value of 24 HU may help to exclude the presence of a primary in lesions below 24 HU, whereas a density above a threshold of 40 HU can help to exclude atelectatic lung. - CONCLUSION: Density measurements in patients with lung cancer and surrounding atelectasis may help to delineate the primary tumor, irrespective of the specific lung cancer subtype. This could improve T staging and radiation treatment planning (RTP) without additional application of a contrast agent in CT, or an additional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), even in cases of lung tumors of neuroendocrine differentiation or in slowly growing tumors with less avidity to [18F]FDG. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 23.04.2020 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1860-2002 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11307-018-1196-9 |