Is the revision of a primary TKA really as easy and safe as the revision of a primary UKA?
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are surgical treatment options for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. Clinical results after both TKA and UKA are good, however, functional outcome and return to sport seem to favor UKA (1). UKA also is associated with a l...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) Editorial |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[December 2016]
|
| In: |
Annals of translational medicine
Year: 2016, Volume: 4, Issue: 24 |
| ISSN: | 2305-5847 |
| DOI: | 10.21037/atm.2016.11.01 |
| Online Access: | Verlag: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2016.11.01 Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: http://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/12567 
|
| Author Notes: | Kevin Staats, Christian Merle, Tom Schmidt-Braekling, Friedrich Boettner, Reinhard Windhager, Wenzel Waldstein |
| Summary: | Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are surgical treatment options for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. Clinical results after both TKA and UKA are good, however, functional outcome and return to sport seem to favor UKA (1). UKA also is associated with a lower risk of perioperative complications, like venous thromboembolic events, stroke and myocardial infarction, and a lower blood transfusion rate (1). |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 12.05.2020 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 2305-5847 |
| DOI: | 10.21037/atm.2016.11.01 |