Marked dissociation of photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity even in normal observers

Although contrast vision is not routinely tested, it is important: for instance, it predicts traffic incidents better than visual acuity. Mesopic contrast sensitivity (CS) testing approximates low-lighting conditions but entails dark adaptation, which can disrupt clinical routine. In receptor-specif...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Hertenstein, Hannah Magdalena (VerfasserIn) , Bach, Michael (VerfasserIn) , Gross, Nikolai Johannes (VerfasserIn) , Beisse, Flemming (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2016
In: Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology
Year: 2015, Jahrgang: 254, Heft: 2, Pages: 373-384
ISSN:1435-702X
DOI:10.1007/s00417-015-3020-4
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-3020-4
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Hannah Hertenstein, Michael Bach, Nikolai Johannes Gross, Flemming Beisse
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Although contrast vision is not routinely tested, it is important: for instance, it predicts traffic incidents better than visual acuity. Mesopic contrast sensitivity (CS) testing approximates low-lighting conditions but entails dark adaptation, which can disrupt clinical routine. In receptor-specific diseases, a dissociation of photopic and mesopic sensitivity would be expected, but can photopic CS act as a surrogate measure for mesopic CS, at least for screening purposes?
Beschreibung:Published online: 29 April 2015
Gesehen am 13.05.2020
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1435-702X
DOI:10.1007/s00417-015-3020-4