Marked dissociation of photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity even in normal observers
Although contrast vision is not routinely tested, it is important: for instance, it predicts traffic incidents better than visual acuity. Mesopic contrast sensitivity (CS) testing approximates low-lighting conditions but entails dark adaptation, which can disrupt clinical routine. In receptor-specif...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2016
|
| In: |
Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology
Year: 2015, Jahrgang: 254, Heft: 2, Pages: 373-384 |
| ISSN: | 1435-702X |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00417-015-3020-4 |
| Online-Zugang: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-3020-4 |
| Verfasserangaben: | Hannah Hertenstein, Michael Bach, Nikolai Johannes Gross, Flemming Beisse |
| Zusammenfassung: | Although contrast vision is not routinely tested, it is important: for instance, it predicts traffic incidents better than visual acuity. Mesopic contrast sensitivity (CS) testing approximates low-lighting conditions but entails dark adaptation, which can disrupt clinical routine. In receptor-specific diseases, a dissociation of photopic and mesopic sensitivity would be expected, but can photopic CS act as a surrogate measure for mesopic CS, at least for screening purposes? |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Published online: 29 April 2015 Gesehen am 13.05.2020 |
| Beschreibung: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1435-702X |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00417-015-3020-4 |