Options to reform the European Union legislation on GMOs: post-authorization and beyond
We discuss options to reform the EU genetically modified organism (GMO) regulatory framework, make risk assessment and decision-making more consistent with scientific principles, and lay the groundwork for international coherence. In this third of three articles, we focus on labeling and coexistence...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
12 February 2020
|
| In: |
Trends in biotechnology
Year: 2020, Jahrgang: 38, Heft: 5, Pages: 465-467 |
| ISSN: | 1879-3096 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.015 |
| Online-Zugang: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.015 Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167779919303105 |
| Verfasserangaben: | Dennis Eriksson, René Custers, Karin Edvardsson Björnberg, Sven Ove Hansson, Kai Purnhagen, Matin Qaim, Jörg Romeis, Joachim Schiemann, Stephan Schleissing, Jale Tosun, and Richard G.F. Visser |
| Zusammenfassung: | We discuss options to reform the EU genetically modified organism (GMO) regulatory framework, make risk assessment and decision-making more consistent with scientific principles, and lay the groundwork for international coherence. In this third of three articles, we focus on labeling and coexistence as well as discuss the political reality and potential ways forward. |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Gesehen am 18.05.2020 |
| Beschreibung: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1879-3096 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.015 |