Buchumschlag

Easy-to-read German put to the test: do adults with intellectual disability or functional illiteracy benefit from compound segmentation?

Easy-to-read (ETR) German is the subject of public debate. Even though it is heavily promoted by officials, its status is controversial. Moreover, the comprehensibility of ETR German texts awaits systematic testing. The aim of the present study was to test a controversial rule concerning word segmen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Pappert, Sandra (VerfasserIn) , Bock, Bettina M. (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2020
In: Reading and writing
Year: 2020, Jahrgang: 33, Heft: 5, Pages: 1105-1131
ISSN:1573-0905
DOI:10.1007/s11145-019-09995-y
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09995-y
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Sandra Pappert, Bettina M. Bock

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1698950837
003 DE-627
005 20220818102017.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200528s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11145-019-09995-y  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1698950837 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1698950837 
035 |a (OCoLC)1341326135 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 51  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Pappert, Sandra  |d 1968-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)140872280  |0 (DE-627)703814605  |0 (DE-576)321140605  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Easy-to-read German put to the test  |b do adults with intellectual disability or functional illiteracy benefit from compound segmentation?  |c Sandra Pappert, Bettina M. Bock 
264 1 |c 2020 
300 |a 27 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Published online: 15 November 2019 
500 |a Gesehen am 28.05.2020 
520 |a Easy-to-read (ETR) German is the subject of public debate. Even though it is heavily promoted by officials, its status is controversial. Moreover, the comprehensibility of ETR German texts awaits systematic testing. The aim of the present study was to test a controversial rule concerning word segmentation. Hypotheses derived from psycholinguistic studies with skilled readers predict an interaction of segmentation and semantic transparency. A sample of individuals, some with intellectual disability and others functionally illiterate, performed a timed lexical decision task on unsegmented and segmented noun compounds that were either semantically transparent or semantically opaque. The results show an advantage of segmentation that was not modulated by semantic transparency. At the same time, a main effect of semantic transparency indicates that the meaning of the compounds was accessed. Two potential loci of the segmentation advantage are discussed: a prelexical one referring to phonological recoding and a lexical one related to access to phonological word forms. The outcome of the experiment approves the practice of segmenting noun compounds in ETR German. The study further attests the feasibility and potential fruitfulness of experimental research with target groups of ETR. 
700 1 |a Bock, Bettina M.  |d 1982-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1034789929  |0 (DE-627)746283547  |0 (DE-576)382421302  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Reading and writing  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1989  |g 33(2020), 5, Seite 1105-1131  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270929010  |w (DE-600)1478082-3  |w (DE-576)121190404  |x 1573-0905  |7 nnas  |a Easy-to-read German put to the test do adults with intellectual disability or functional illiteracy benefit from compound segmentation? 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2020  |g number:5  |g pages:1105-1131  |g extent:27  |a Easy-to-read German put to the test do adults with intellectual disability or functional illiteracy benefit from compound segmentation? 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09995-y  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
992 |a 20200528 
993 |a Article 
994 |a 2020 
998 |g 140872280  |a Pappert, Sandra  |m 140872280:Pappert, Sandra  |d 90000  |d 90600  |e 90000PP140872280  |e 90600PP140872280  |k 0/90000/  |k 1/90000/90600/  |p 1  |x j 
999 |a KXP-PPN1698950837  |e 3673718940 
BIB |a Y 
SER |a journal 
JSO |a {"person":[{"family":"Pappert","given":"Sandra","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","display":"Pappert, Sandra","role":"aut"},{"role":"aut","display":"Bock, Bettina M.","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","given":"Bettina M.","family":"Bock"}],"title":[{"subtitle":"do adults with intellectual disability or functional illiteracy benefit from compound segmentation?","title":"Easy-to-read German put to the test","title_sort":"Easy-to-read German put to the test"}],"recId":"1698950837","language":["eng"],"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"article-journal"},"note":["Published online: 15 November 2019","Gesehen am 28.05.2020"],"name":{"displayForm":["Sandra Pappert, Bettina M. Bock"]},"id":{"eki":["1698950837"],"doi":["10.1007/s11145-019-09995-y"]},"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"2020","dateIssuedKey":"2020"}],"relHost":[{"physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"id":{"issn":["1573-0905"],"zdb":["1478082-3"],"eki":["270929010"]},"origin":[{"publisher":"Springer Science + Business Media B.V ; Kluwer","dateIssuedKey":"1989","dateIssuedDisp":"1989-","publisherPlace":"Dordrecht [u.a.] ; Dordrecht [u.a.]"}],"part":{"year":"2020","pages":"1105-1131","issue":"5","text":"33(2020), 5, Seite 1105-1131","volume":"33","extent":"27"},"pubHistory":["1.1989 -"],"language":["eng"],"recId":"270929010","type":{"bibl":"periodical","media":"Online-Ressource"},"note":["Gesehen am 11.05.10"],"disp":"Easy-to-read German put to the test do adults with intellectual disability or functional illiteracy benefit from compound segmentation?Reading and writing","title":[{"title_sort":"Reading and writing","subtitle":"an interdisciplinary journal","title":"Reading and writing"}]}],"physDesc":[{"extent":"27 S."}]} 
SRT |a PAPPERTSANEASYTOREAD2020 

Ähnliche Einträge