Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images

Purpose: Dual energy CT (DECT) has recently been proposed as an improvement over single energy CT (SECT) for stopping power ratio (SPR) estimation for proton therapy treatment planning (TP), thereby potentially reducing range uncertainties. Published literature investigated phantoms. This study aims...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Hudobivnik, Nace (VerfasserIn) , Schwarz, Florian (VerfasserIn) , Johnson, Thorsten (VerfasserIn) , Agolli, Linda (VerfasserIn) , Dedes, George (VerfasserIn) , Tessonnier, Thomas (VerfasserIn) , Verhaegen, Frank (VerfasserIn) , Thieke, Christian (VerfasserIn) , Belka, Claus (VerfasserIn) , Sommer, Wieland H. (VerfasserIn) , Parodi, Katia (VerfasserIn) , Landry, Guillaume (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 04 January 2016
In: Medical physics
Year: 2016, Jahrgang: 43, Heft: 1, Pages: 495-504
ISSN:2473-4209
DOI:10.1118/1.4939106
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4939106
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1118/1.4939106
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Nace Hudobivnik, Florian Schwarz, Thorsten Johnson, Linda Agolli, George Dedes, Thomas Tessonnier, Frank Verhaegen, Christian Thieke, Claus Belka, Wieland H. Sommer, Katia Parodi, Guillaume Landry

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1699212430
003 DE-627
005 20230427032033.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200602s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1118/1.4939106  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1699212430 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1699212430 
035 |a (OCoLC)1341327268 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 33  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Hudobivnik, Nace  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1211371948  |0 (DE-627)1699212279  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images  |c Nace Hudobivnik, Florian Schwarz, Thorsten Johnson, Linda Agolli, George Dedes, Thomas Tessonnier, Frank Verhaegen, Christian Thieke, Claus Belka, Wieland H. Sommer, Katia Parodi, Guillaume Landry 
264 1 |c 04 January 2016 
300 |a 10 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Gesehen am 02.06.2020 
520 |a Purpose: Dual energy CT (DECT) has recently been proposed as an improvement over single energy CT (SECT) for stopping power ratio (SPR) estimation for proton therapy treatment planning (TP), thereby potentially reducing range uncertainties. Published literature investigated phantoms. This study aims at performing proton therapy TP on SECT and DECT head images of the same patients and at evaluating whether the reported improved DECT SPR accuracy translates into clinically relevant range shifts in clinical head treatment scenarios. Methods: Two phantoms were scanned at a last generation dual source DECT scanner at 90 and 150 kVp with Sn filtration. The first phantom (Gammex phantom) was used to calibrate the scanner in terms of SPR while the second served as evaluation (CIRS phantom). DECT images of five head trauma patients were used as surrogate cancer patient images for TP of proton therapy. Pencil beam algorithm based TP was performed on SECT and DECT images and the dose distributions corresponding to the optimized proton plans were calculated using a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation platform using the same patient geometry for both plans obtained from conversion of the 150 kVp images. Range shifts between the MC dose distributions from SECT and DECT plans were assessed using 2D range maps. Results: SPR root mean square errors (RMSEs) for the inserts of the Gammex phantom were 1.9%, 1.8%, and 1.2% for SECT phantom calibration (SECTphantom), SECT stoichiometric calibration (SECTstoichiometric), and DECT calibration, respectively. For the CIRS phantom, these were 3.6%, 1.6%, and 1.0%. When investigating patient anatomy, group median range differences of up to −1.4% were observed for head cases when comparing SECTstoichiometric with DECT. For this calibration the 25th and 75th percentiles varied from −2% to 0% across the five patients. The group median was found to be limited to 0.5% when using SECTphantom and the 25th and 75th percentiles varied from −1% to 2%. Conclusions: Proton therapy TP using a pencil beam algorithm and DECT images was performed for the first time. Given that the DECT accuracy as evaluated by two phantoms was 1.2% and 1.0% RMSE, it is questionable whether the range differences reported here are significant. 
650 4 |a Biological material 
650 4 |a Calibration 
650 4 |a cancer 
650 4 |a Cancer 
650 4 |a Collisional energy loss 
650 4 |a Computed tomography 
650 4 |a Computerised tomographs 
650 4 |a computerised tomography 
650 4 |a dual energy CT 
650 4 |a e.g. blood 
650 4 |a Haemocytometers 
650 4 |a injuries 
650 4 |a Medical imaging 
650 4 |a Medical treatment planning 
650 4 |a Monte Carlo methods 
650 4 |a pencil beam algorithm 
650 4 |a phantoms 
650 4 |a proton therapy 
650 4 |a Proton therapy 
650 4 |a Protons 
650 4 |a radiation therapy 
650 4 |a Radiation therapy 
650 4 |a range uncertainty 
650 4 |a Tissues 
650 4 |a treatment planning 
650 4 |a Treatment planning 
650 4 |a tumours 
650 4 |a urine 
700 1 |a Schwarz, Florian  |d 1983-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1033280747  |0 (DE-627)740808400  |0 (DE-576)380859726  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Johnson, Thorsten  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Agolli, Linda  |d 1983-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1214601774  |0 (DE-627)1725574683  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Dedes, George  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Tessonnier, Thomas  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1075079195  |0 (DE-627)83292685X  |0 (DE-576)443252270  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Verhaegen, Frank  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Thieke, Christian  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Belka, Claus  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sommer, Wieland H.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Parodi, Katia  |d 1975-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)129736996  |0 (DE-627)707308917  |0 (DE-576)188641688  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Landry, Guillaume  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Medical physics  |d Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1974  |g 43(2016), 1, Seite 495-504  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)265784867  |w (DE-600)1466421-5  |w (DE-576)074891243  |x 2473-4209  |7 nnas  |a Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images 
773 1 8 |g volume:43  |g year:2016  |g number:1  |g pages:495-504  |g extent:10  |a Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4939106  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1118/1.4939106  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
992 |a 20200602 
993 |a Article 
994 |a 2016 
998 |g 1075079195  |a Tessonnier, Thomas  |m 1075079195:Tessonnier, Thomas  |d 910000  |d 911400  |e 910000PT1075079195  |e 911400PT1075079195  |k 0/910000/  |k 1/910000/911400/  |p 6 
999 |a KXP-PPN1699212430  |e 3681626448 
BIB |a Y 
SER |a journal 
JSO |a {"language":["eng"],"title":[{"title":"Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images","title_sort":"Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images"}],"relHost":[{"language":["eng"],"part":{"volume":"43","text":"43(2016), 1, Seite 495-504","year":"2016","extent":"10","pages":"495-504","issue":"1"},"title":[{"title_sort":"Medical physics","title":"Medical physics"}],"pubHistory":["1.1974 -"],"name":{"displayForm":["American Association of Physicists in Medicine ; American Institute of Physics"]},"origin":[{"publisherPlace":"Hoboken, NJ ; College Park, Md. ; New York, NY","publisher":"Wiley ; AAPM ; [Verlag nicht ermittelbar]","dateIssuedDisp":"1974-","dateIssuedKey":"1974"}],"recId":"265784867","titleAlt":[{"title":"Medical physics online"}],"type":{"bibl":"periodical","media":"Online-Ressource"},"note":["Gesehen am 01.08.2025"],"id":{"eki":["265784867"],"issn":["2473-4209","1522-8541"],"zdb":["1466421-5"]},"disp":"Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT imagesMedical physics","physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}]}],"note":["Gesehen am 02.06.2020"],"id":{"doi":["10.1118/1.4939106"],"eki":["1699212430"]},"physDesc":[{"extent":"10 S."}],"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"04 January 2016","dateIssuedKey":"2016"}],"recId":"1699212430","type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"article-journal"},"person":[{"role":"aut","given":"Nace","display":"Hudobivnik, Nace","family":"Hudobivnik"},{"family":"Schwarz","role":"aut","given":"Florian","display":"Schwarz, Florian"},{"family":"Johnson","display":"Johnson, Thorsten","given":"Thorsten","role":"aut"},{"family":"Agolli","display":"Agolli, Linda","given":"Linda","role":"aut"},{"family":"Dedes","display":"Dedes, George","given":"George","role":"aut"},{"family":"Tessonnier","display":"Tessonnier, Thomas","role":"aut","given":"Thomas"},{"display":"Verhaegen, Frank","role":"aut","given":"Frank","family":"Verhaegen"},{"given":"Christian","role":"aut","display":"Thieke, Christian","family":"Thieke"},{"family":"Belka","given":"Claus","role":"aut","display":"Belka, Claus"},{"display":"Sommer, Wieland H.","given":"Wieland H.","role":"aut","family":"Sommer"},{"role":"aut","given":"Katia","display":"Parodi, Katia","family":"Parodi"},{"family":"Landry","given":"Guillaume","role":"aut","display":"Landry, Guillaume"}],"name":{"displayForm":["Nace Hudobivnik, Florian Schwarz, Thorsten Johnson, Linda Agolli, George Dedes, Thomas Tessonnier, Frank Verhaegen, Christian Thieke, Claus Belka, Wieland H. Sommer, Katia Parodi, Guillaume Landry"]}} 
SRT |a HUDOBIVNIKCOMPARISON0420