Characteristics and attitudes of women in relation to chosen fertility preservation techniques: a prospective, multicenter questionnaire-based study with 144 participants

Objective - What are the patients attitudes about their fertility and about the counselling process at the time when fertility preservation counselling is performed? - Study design - A survey regarding fertility concerns and counselling performance in relation to the chosen fertility preservation pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Wolff, Michael von (VerfasserIn) , Giesecke, Dagmar (VerfasserIn) , Germeyer, Ariane (VerfasserIn) , Lawrenz, Barbara (VerfasserIn) , Henes, Melanie (VerfasserIn) , Nawroth, Frank (VerfasserIn) , Friebel, Stefanie (VerfasserIn) , Rohde, Anke (VerfasserIn) , Giesecke, Peter (VerfasserIn) , Denschlag, Dominik (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: [2016]
In: European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology
Year: 2016, Jahrgang: 201, Pages: 12-17
ISSN:1872-7654
DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.01.027
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.01.027
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211516300069
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Michael von Wolff, Dagmar Giesecke, Ariane Germeyer, Barbara Lawrenz, Melanie Henes, Frank Nawroth, Stefanie Friebel, Anke Rohde, Peter Giesecke, Dominik Denschlag

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1699810338
003 DE-627
005 20220818112759.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200604s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.01.027  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1699810338 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1699810338 
035 |a (OCoLC)1341328276 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 33  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Wolff, Michael von  |d 1966-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)118117718  |0 (DE-627)079253776  |0 (DE-576)291724361  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Characteristics and attitudes of women in relation to chosen fertility preservation techniques  |b a prospective, multicenter questionnaire-based study with 144 participants  |c Michael von Wolff, Dagmar Giesecke, Ariane Germeyer, Barbara Lawrenz, Melanie Henes, Frank Nawroth, Stefanie Friebel, Anke Rohde, Peter Giesecke, Dominik Denschlag 
264 1 |c [2016] 
300 |b Diagramme 
300 |a 6 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Gesehen am 04.06.2020 
520 |a Objective - What are the patients attitudes about their fertility and about the counselling process at the time when fertility preservation counselling is performed? - Study design - A survey regarding fertility concerns and counselling performance in relation to the chosen fertility preservation procedure such as no treatment, GnRH agonists, and freezing of ovarian tissue or oocytes/zygotes was prospectively conducted in four university centres and one private centre, all belonging to the network FertiPROTEKT in Germany and Switzerland. - Results - All women (n=145) received a questionnaire at the first counselling appointment. The mean age of the patients was 30 years (±5.8, range 17-43 years). 91% were referred by their treating oncologists. Single patients preferred invasive strategies, such as freezing of oocytes/zygotes (44.3%) or freezing of ovarian tissue (36%), whereas only 19.7% opted for no treatment/GnRH agonists. In married couples, the proportions were 28.9%, 31.1% and 40.0% respectively. Women without children also opted more frequently for invasive strategies, such as freezing of oocytes/zygotes (84.5%) or freezing of ovarian tissue (74.1%), and less frequently for no treatment/GnRH agonists (63.3%). Physical and psychological status, current and future fertility concerns and satisfaction with the counselling process were equal in all treatment groups. - Conclusion - As fertility concerns and attitudes about the counselling process were independent from the fertility preservation procedure chosen, the preferred treatment can hardly be predicted and therefore all women should be counselled about all possible fertility preservation techniques. 
650 4 |a Cancer 
650 4 |a Counselling 
650 4 |a Fertility 
650 4 |a Fertility preservation 
650 4 |a Oocyte cryopreservation 
650 4 |a Ovarian tissue cryopreservation 
700 1 |a Giesecke, Dagmar  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Germeyer, Ariane  |d 1973-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)122985788  |0 (DE-627)706117697  |0 (DE-576)293507856  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lawrenz, Barbara  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Henes, Melanie  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Nawroth, Frank  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Friebel, Stefanie  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Rohde, Anke  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Giesecke, Peter  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Denschlag, Dominik  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology  |d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1973  |g 201(2016), Seite 12-17  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320443469  |w (DE-600)2005196-7  |w (DE-576)094142106  |x 1872-7654  |7 nnas  |a Characteristics and attitudes of women in relation to chosen fertility preservation techniques a prospective, multicenter questionnaire-based study with 144 participants 
773 1 8 |g volume:201  |g year:2016  |g pages:12-17  |g extent:6  |a Characteristics and attitudes of women in relation to chosen fertility preservation techniques a prospective, multicenter questionnaire-based study with 144 participants 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.01.027  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211516300069  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
992 |a 20200604 
993 |a Article 
994 |a 2016 
998 |g 122985788  |a Germeyer, Ariane  |m 122985788:Germeyer, Ariane  |d 910000  |d 910400  |e 910000PG122985788  |e 910400PG122985788  |k 0/910000/  |k 1/910000/910400/  |p 3 
999 |a KXP-PPN1699810338  |e 3682695788 
BIB |a Y 
SER |a journal 
JSO |a {"name":{"displayForm":["Michael von Wolff, Dagmar Giesecke, Ariane Germeyer, Barbara Lawrenz, Melanie Henes, Frank Nawroth, Stefanie Friebel, Anke Rohde, Peter Giesecke, Dominik Denschlag"]},"id":{"doi":["10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.01.027"],"eki":["1699810338"]},"recId":"1699810338","physDesc":[{"extent":"6 S.","noteIll":"Diagramme"}],"person":[{"display":"Wolff, Michael von","role":"aut","given":"Michael von","family":"Wolff"},{"display":"Giesecke, Dagmar","family":"Giesecke","given":"Dagmar","role":"aut"},{"display":"Germeyer, Ariane","role":"aut","given":"Ariane","family":"Germeyer"},{"family":"Lawrenz","role":"aut","given":"Barbara","display":"Lawrenz, Barbara"},{"given":"Melanie","role":"aut","family":"Henes","display":"Henes, Melanie"},{"display":"Nawroth, Frank","family":"Nawroth","role":"aut","given":"Frank"},{"display":"Friebel, Stefanie","role":"aut","given":"Stefanie","family":"Friebel"},{"display":"Rohde, Anke","family":"Rohde","given":"Anke","role":"aut"},{"family":"Giesecke","role":"aut","given":"Peter","display":"Giesecke, Peter"},{"given":"Dominik","role":"aut","family":"Denschlag","display":"Denschlag, Dominik"}],"relHost":[{"origin":[{"publisherPlace":"Amsterdam [u.a.]","dateIssuedKey":"1973","dateIssuedDisp":"1973-","publisher":"Elsevier Science"}],"pubHistory":["3.1973 -"],"id":{"zdb":["2005196-7"],"eki":["320443469"],"issn":["1872-7654"]},"title":[{"subtitle":"the official journal of the European Association of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (EAGO) & the European College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG)","title":"European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology","title_sort":"European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology"}],"part":{"extent":"6","volume":"201","text":"201(2016), Seite 12-17","year":"2016","pages":"12-17"},"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"periodical"},"language":["eng"],"note":["Gesehen am 20.11.24","Ungezählte Beil.: Supplement"],"recId":"320443469","physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"disp":"Characteristics and attitudes of women in relation to chosen fertility preservation techniques a prospective, multicenter questionnaire-based study with 144 participantsEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology"}],"origin":[{"dateIssuedKey":"2016","dateIssuedDisp":"[2016]"}],"title":[{"title_sort":"Characteristics and attitudes of women in relation to chosen fertility preservation techniques","title":"Characteristics and attitudes of women in relation to chosen fertility preservation techniques","subtitle":"a prospective, multicenter questionnaire-based study with 144 participants"}],"note":["Gesehen am 04.06.2020"],"language":["eng"],"type":{"bibl":"article-journal","media":"Online-Ressource"}} 
SRT |a WOLFFMICHACHARACTERI2016