Laparoscopic augmentation of the diaphragmatic hiatus with biologic mesh versus suture repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernias is associated with high recurrence rates. Erosion and mesh migration are rare but devastating complications of synthetic mesh repair, whereas reoperation is accompanied by significant operative morbidity. The aim of this study was to estimate the comparati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Antoniou, Stavros A. (Verfasst von) , Müller, Beat P. (Verfasst von) , Antoniou, George A. (Verfasst von) , Köhler, Gernot (Verfasst von) , Luketina, Ruzica-Rosalia (Verfasst von) , Koch, Oliver O. (Verfasst von) , Pointner, Rudolph (Verfasst von) , Granderath, Frank A. (Verfasst von)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 07 June 2015
In: Langenbeck's archives of surgery
Year: 2015, Jahrgang: 400, Heft: 5, Pages: 577-583
ISSN:1435-2451
DOI:10.1007/s00423-015-1312-0
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-015-1312-0
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Stavros A. Antoniou, Beat P. Müller-Stich, George A. Antoniou, Gernot Köhler, Ruzica-Rosalia Luketina, Oliver O. Koch, Rudolph Pointner, Frank-Alexander Granderath
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernias is associated with high recurrence rates. Erosion and mesh migration are rare but devastating complications of synthetic mesh repair, whereas reoperation is accompanied by significant operative morbidity. The aim of this study was to estimate the comparative risk of hernia recurrence following primary suture or biologic mesh repair.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 27.07.2020
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1435-2451
DOI:10.1007/s00423-015-1312-0