Measuring skill and chance in different versions of Poker

This paper aims to measure skill and chance in different versions of online poker, using the best-fit Elo algorithm established in the first chapter. While Texas Hold'em arguably is the most popular version being played, the amount of skill involved might differ from other versions like Omaha H...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Lambrecht, Marco (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Buch/Monographie Arbeitspapier
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Heidelberg University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics August 2020
Ausgabe:This version: July 15, 2020
Schriftenreihe:Discussion paper series / University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics no. 687
In: Discussion paper series (no. 687)

DOI:10.11588/heidok.00028822
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Verlag, kostenfrei: http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/28822/1/Lambrecht_2020_dp687.pdf
Resolving-System, kostenfrei: https://doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00028822
Resolving-System, kostenfrei: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/235010
Resolving-System, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-heidok-288226
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Marco Lambrecht
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This paper aims to measure skill and chance in different versions of online poker, using the best-fit Elo algorithm established in the first chapter. While Texas Hold'em arguably is the most popular version being played, the amount of skill involved might differ from other versions like Omaha Hold'em. Many platforms offer faster procedures to play (e.g. "hyper turbo"), as well as different levels of stakes. Given the richness of online poker data, it is possible to isolate the impact of these variations individually. The heterogeneity of best-fit Elo ratings decreases in quicker competitions or with higher stakes. Meanwhile, Omaha seems to contain more elements of skill than Texas Hold'em, as its analysis shows a wider distribution of skill levels of players.
Beschreibung:Online Resource
DOI:10.11588/heidok.00028822