Clinical comparison of metal ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses with a conventional and a mixed retainer design
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Little is known about the clinical performance of fixed dental prostheses that rigidly connect adhesive retainers and crowns. - PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to assess and compare the clinical performance of resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses with a...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[September 2014]
|
| In: |
The journal of prosthetic dentistry
Year: 2014, Volume: 112, Issue: 3, Pages: 472-480 |
| ISSN: | 1097-6841 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.025 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.025
|
| Author Notes: | Wolfgang Boemicke, MSc, DrMedDent, Stefanie Kappel, DrMedDent, Thomas Stober, PD, DrMedDent, and Peter Rammelsberg, ProfDrMedDent (University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg,Germany) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1729824196 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240406193253.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200910s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.025 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1729824196 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1729824196 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1341359290 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 33 |2 sdnb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bömicke, Wolfgang |d 1981- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1015022146 |0 (DE-627)668338792 |0 (DE-576)349947651 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Clinical comparison of metal ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses with a conventional and a mixed retainer design |c Wolfgang Boemicke, MSc, DrMedDent, Stefanie Kappel, DrMedDent, Thomas Stober, PD, DrMedDent, and Peter Rammelsberg, ProfDrMedDent (University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg,Germany) |
| 264 | 1 | |c [September 2014] | |
| 300 | |b Illustrationen | ||
| 300 | |a 9 | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Gesehen am 10.09.2020 | ||
| 520 | |a STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Little is known about the clinical performance of fixed dental prostheses that rigidly connect adhesive retainers and crowns. - PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to assess and compare the clinical performance of resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses with a conventional and a mixed retainer design. - MATERIAL AND METHODS: Included as participants were all patients of the hospital since 2004 with regular clinical follow-up who were treated with 3-unit or 4-unit metal ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses with a conventional 2-adhesive retainer design (conventional group) or with a mixed type combining an adhesive retainer with a crown or a partial crown retainer (mixed group). The analysis included 84 participants with a total of 57 (64%) prostheses in the conventional group and 32 (36%) prostheses in the mixed group. Treatment and data collection were standardized. Cumulative survival without failure (defined as a restoration in need of replacement), chipping, and debonding were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared for the groups (log-rank test) (α=.05). - RESULTS: During a mean observation period of 4.1 years (SD, 2.5 years; minimum, 0.4 years; maximum, 9.4 years), 12 complications occurred in 10 restorations. Defects of the ceramic veneer (n=6) were observed most frequently. The estimated 5-year failure-free survival rate was 97.4% (standard error, .025) in the conventional group and 95% (standard error, .049) in the mixed group (log-rank, P=.32). The 5-year cumulative survival rate without chipping was 90.7% (standard error, .064) for the conventional group and 93.8% (standard error, .061) for the mixed group (log-rank, P=.44). The 5-year cumulative survival rate without debonding was 95.1% (standard error, .034) for the conventional group and 91.5% (standard error, .058) for the mixed group (log-rank, P=.54). - CONCLUSIONS: Limited by a small sample size and a short follow-up period, the findings of this retrospective analysis indicate that the clinical performance, in terms of survival and the incidence of complications, is comparable for conventional resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses and those that rigidly connect an adhesive wing and a partial or complete crown. Acceptable 5-year survival and complication rates imply that the medium-term prognosis for resin-bonded restorations with a retentive preparation design is comparable with that for conventional fixed dental prostheses. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Adolescent | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Adult | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Aged | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Aged, 80 and over | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ceramics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Crowns | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dental Abutments | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dental Materials | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dental Restoration Failure | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dental Veneers | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Denture Design | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Denture Retention | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Denture, Partial, Fixed | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Denture, Partial, Fixed, Resin-Bonded | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Female | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Follow-Up Studies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Humans | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Male | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Metal Ceramic Alloys | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Middle Aged | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Prognosis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Retrospective Studies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Surface Properties | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Survival Analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Treatment Outcome | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Young Adult | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kappel, Stefanie |d 1980- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)13162590X |0 (DE-627)707687101 |0 (DE-576)298633876 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Stober, Thomas |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1075056535 |0 (DE-627)832903337 |0 (DE-576)44322644X |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rammelsberg, Peter |d 1959- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)122469836 |0 (DE-627)705920836 |0 (DE-576)293285640 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The journal of prosthetic dentistry |d London [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1951 |g 112(2014), 3, Seite 472-480 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320495787 |w (DE-600)2011581-7 |w (DE-576)09101509X |x 1097-6841 |7 nnas |a Clinical comparison of metal ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses with a conventional and a mixed retainer design |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:112 |g year:2014 |g number:3 |g pages:472-480 |g extent:9 |a Clinical comparison of metal ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses with a conventional and a mixed retainer design |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.025 |x Verlag |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 992 | |a 20200910 | ||
| 993 | |a Article | ||
| 994 | |a 2014 | ||
| 998 | |g 122469836 |a Rammelsberg, Peter |m 122469836:Rammelsberg, Peter |d 50000 |e 50000PR122469836 |k 0/50000/ |p 4 |y j | ||
| 998 | |g 1075056535 |a Stober, Thomas |m 1075056535:Stober, Thomas |d 50000 |e 50000PS1075056535 |k 0/50000/ |p 3 | ||
| 998 | |g 13162590X |a Kappel, Stefanie |m 13162590X:Kappel, Stefanie |d 50000 |e 50000PK13162590X |k 0/50000/ |p 2 | ||
| 998 | |g 1015022146 |a Bömicke, Wolfgang |m 1015022146:Bömicke, Wolfgang |d 910000 |d 910800 |e 910000PB1015022146 |e 910800PB1015022146 |k 0/910000/ |k 1/910000/910800/ |p 1 |x j | ||
| 999 | |a KXP-PPN1729824196 |e 3748823568 | ||
| BIB | |a Y | ||
| SER | |a journal | ||
| JSO | |a {"relHost":[{"part":{"volume":"112","text":"112(2014), 3, Seite 472-480","pages":"472-480","extent":"9","year":"2014","issue":"3"},"physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"titleAlt":[{"title":"JPD"}],"title":[{"title":"The journal of prosthetic dentistry","title_sort":"journal of prosthetic dentistry"}],"origin":[{"dateIssuedKey":"1951","publisher":"Elsevier ; Mosby","publisherPlace":"London [u.a.] ; St. Louis, Mo.","dateIssuedDisp":"1951-"}],"id":{"issn":["1097-6841"],"zdb":["2011581-7"],"eki":["320495787"]},"language":["eng"],"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"periodical"},"recId":"320495787","pubHistory":["1.1951 -"],"note":["Gesehen am 07.08.25"],"disp":"Clinical comparison of metal ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses with a conventional and a mixed retainer designThe journal of prosthetic dentistry"}],"physDesc":[{"extent":"9 S.","noteIll":"Illustrationen"}],"person":[{"given":"Wolfgang","family":"Bömicke","display":"Bömicke, Wolfgang","role":"aut"},{"given":"Stefanie","display":"Kappel, Stefanie","family":"Kappel","role":"aut"},{"display":"Stober, Thomas","family":"Stober","given":"Thomas","role":"aut"},{"family":"Rammelsberg","display":"Rammelsberg, Peter","given":"Peter","role":"aut"}],"title":[{"title_sort":"Clinical comparison of metal ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses with a conventional and a mixed retainer design","title":"Clinical comparison of metal ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses with a conventional and a mixed retainer design"}],"type":{"bibl":"article-journal","media":"Online-Ressource"},"id":{"doi":["10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.025"],"eki":["1729824196"]},"language":["eng"],"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"[September 2014]","dateIssuedKey":"2014"}],"recId":"1729824196","note":["Gesehen am 10.09.2020"],"name":{"displayForm":["Wolfgang Boemicke, MSc, DrMedDent, Stefanie Kappel, DrMedDent, Thomas Stober, PD, DrMedDent, and Peter Rammelsberg, ProfDrMedDent (University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg,Germany)"]}} | ||
| SRT | |a BOEMICKEWOCLINICALCO2014 | ||