Buchumschlag

Gastrointestinal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy with epidural vs patient-controlled intravenous analgesia: a randomized clinical trial

<h3>Importance</h3><p>Morbidity is still high in pancreatic surgery, driven mainly by gastrointestinal complications such as pancreatic fistula. Perioperative thoracic epidural analgesia (EDA) and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) are frequently used for pain control...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Klotz, Rosa (VerfasserIn) , Larmann, Jan (VerfasserIn) , Klose, Christina (VerfasserIn) , Bruckner, Thomas (VerfasserIn) , Benner, Laura (VerfasserIn) , Dörr-Harim, Colette (VerfasserIn) , Tenckhoff, Solveig (VerfasserIn) , Lock, Johan F. (VerfasserIn) , Brede, Elmar-Marc (VerfasserIn) , Salvia, Roberto (VerfasserIn) , Polati, Enrico (VerfasserIn) , Köninger, Jörg (VerfasserIn) , Schiff, Jan-Henrik (VerfasserIn) , Wittel, Uwe A. (VerfasserIn) , Hötzel, Alexander (VerfasserIn) , Keck, Tobias (VerfasserIn) , Nau, Carla (VerfasserIn) , Amati, Anca-Laura (VerfasserIn) , Koch, Christian (VerfasserIn) , Eberl, Thomas (VerfasserIn) , Zink, Michael (VerfasserIn) , Tomazic, Ales (VerfasserIn) , Novak-Jankovic, Vesna (VerfasserIn) , Hofer, Stefan (VerfasserIn) , Diener, Markus K. (VerfasserIn) , Weigand, Markus A. (VerfasserIn) , Büchler, Markus W. (VerfasserIn) , Knebel, Phillip (VerfasserIn) , Group, for the PAKMAN Trial (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: May 27, 2020
In: JAMA surgery
Year: 2020, Jahrgang: 155, Heft: 7, Pages: e200794-e200794
ISSN:2168-6262
DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0794
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0794
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/2765992
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Rosa Klotz, Jan Larmann, Christina Klose, Thomas Bruckner, Laura Benner, Colette Doerr-Harim, Solveig Tenckhoff, Johan F. Lock, Elmar-Marc Brede, Roberto Salvia, Enrico Polati, Jörg Köninger, Jan-Henrik Schiff, Uwe A. Wittel, Alexander Hötzel, Tobias Keck, Carla Nau, Anca-Laura Amati, Christian Koch, Thomas Eberl, Michael Zink, Ales Tomazic, Vesna Novak-Jankovic, Stefan Hofer, Markus K. Diener, Markus A. Weigand, Markus W. Büchler, Phillip Knebel; for the PAKMAN Trial Group
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:<h3>Importance</h3><p>Morbidity is still high in pancreatic surgery, driven mainly by gastrointestinal complications such as pancreatic fistula. Perioperative thoracic epidural analgesia (EDA) and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) are frequently used for pain control after pancreatic surgery. Evidence from a post hoc analysis suggests that PCIA is associated with fewer gastrointestinal complications.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine whether postoperative PCIA decreases the occurrence of gastrointestinal complications after pancreatic surgery compared with EDA.</p><h3>Design, Setting, and Participants</h3><p>In this adaptive, pragmatic, international, multicenter, superiority randomized clinical trial conducted from June 30, 2015, to October 1, 2017, 371 patients at 9 European pancreatic surgery centers who were scheduled for elective pancreatoduodenectomy were randomized to receive PCIA (n = 185) or EDA (n = 186); 248 patients (124 in each group) were analyzed. Data were analyzed from February 22 to April 25, 2019, using modified intention to treat and per protocol.</p><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Patients in the PCIA group received general anesthesia and postoperative PCIA with intravenous opioids with the help of a patient-controlled analgesia device. In the EDA group, patients received general anesthesia and intraoperative and postoperative EDA.</p><h3>Main Outcomes and Measures</h3><p>The primary end point was a composite of pancreatic fistula, bile leakage, delayed gastric emptying, gastrointestinal bleeding, or postoperative ileus within 30 days after surgery. Secondary end points included 30-day mortality, other complications, postoperative pain levels, intraoperative or postoperative use of vasopressor therapy, and fluid substitution.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 248 patients analyzed (147 men; mean [SD] age, 64.9 [10.7] years), the primary composite end point did not differ between the PCIA group (61 [49.2%]) and EDA group (57 [46.0%]) (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.71-1.95<i>P</i> = .54). Neither individual components of the primary end point nor 30-day mortality, postoperative pain levels, or intraoperative and postoperative substitution of fluids differed significantly between groups. Patients receiving EDA gained more weight by postoperative day 4 than patients receiving PCIA (mean [SD], 4.6 [3.8] vs 3.4 [3.6] kg;<i>P</i> = .03) and received more vasopressors (46 [37.1%] vs 31 [25.0%];<i>P</i> = .04). Failure of EDA occurred in 23 patients (18.5%).</p><h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3><p>This study found that the choice between PCIA and EDA for pain control after pancreatic surgery should not be based on concerns regarding gastrointestinal complications because the 2 procedures are comparable with regard to effectiveness and safety. However, EDA was associated with several shortcomings.</p><h3>Trial Registration</h3><p>German Clinical Trials Register:DRKS00007784</p>
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 30.10.2020
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:2168-6262
DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0794

Ähnliche Einträge