Dengue vaccine development by the year 2020: challenges and prospects

The first licensed dengue vaccine led to considerable controversy, and to date, no dengue vaccine is in widespread use. All three leading dengue vaccine candidates are live attenuated vaccines, with the main difference between them being the type of backbone and the extent of chimerization. While CY...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Wilder-Smith, Annelies (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 18 October 2020
In: Current opinion in virology
Year: 2020, Jahrgang: 43, Pages: 71-78
ISSN:1879-6265
DOI:10.1016/j.coviro.2020.09.004
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2020.09.004
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879625720300948
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Annelies Wilder-Smith
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The first licensed dengue vaccine led to considerable controversy, and to date, no dengue vaccine is in widespread use. All three leading dengue vaccine candidates are live attenuated vaccines, with the main difference between them being the type of backbone and the extent of chimerization. While CYD-TDV (the first licensed dengue vaccine) does not include non-structural proteins of dengue, TAK-003 contains the dengue virus serotype 2 backbone, and the Butantan/Merck vaccine contains three full-genomes of the four dengue virus serotypes. While dengue-primed individuals can already benefit from vaccination against all four serotypes with the first licensed dengue vaccine CYD-TDV, the need for dengue-naive population has not yet been met. To improve tetravalent protection, sequential vaccination should be considered in addition to a heterologous prime-boost approach.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 18.01.2021
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1879-6265
DOI:10.1016/j.coviro.2020.09.004