The prognostic effect of cardiac rehabilitation in the era of acute revascularisation and statin therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies - The Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS)

BackgroundThe prognostic effect of multi-component cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in the modern era of statins and acute revascularisation remains controversial. Focusing on actual clinical practice, the aim was to evaluate the effect of CR on total mortality and other clinical endpoints after an acute...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rauch, Bernhard (Author) , Saure, Daniel (Author) , Jensen, Katrin (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 2016
In: European journal of preventive cardiology
Year: 2016, Volume: 23, Issue: 18, Pages: 1914-1939
ISSN:2047-4881
DOI:10.1177/2047487316671181
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487316671181
Get full text
Author Notes:Bernhard Rauch, Constantinos H. Davos, Patrick Doherty, Daniel Saure, Maria-Inti Metzendorf, Annett Salzwedel, Heinz Völler, Katrin Jensen and Jean-Paul Schmid; on behalf of the "Cardiac Rehabilitation Section", European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC), in cooperation with the Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics (IMBI), Department of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, and the Cochrane Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders Group, Institute of General Practice, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1745630112
003 DE-627
005 20230426064715.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210126s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/2047487316671181  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1745630112 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1745630112 
035 |a (OCoLC)1341389613 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 33  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Rauch, Bernhard  |d 1947-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)121440060  |0 (DE-627)081308485  |0 (DE-576)292711743  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The prognostic effect of cardiac rehabilitation in the era of acute revascularisation and statin therapy  |b a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies - The Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS)  |c Bernhard Rauch, Constantinos H. Davos, Patrick Doherty, Daniel Saure, Maria-Inti Metzendorf, Annett Salzwedel, Heinz Völler, Katrin Jensen and Jean-Paul Schmid; on behalf of the "Cardiac Rehabilitation Section", European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC), in cooperation with the Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics (IMBI), Department of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, and the Cochrane Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders Group, Institute of General Practice, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany 
264 1 |c 2016 
300 |a 26 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Published: 29 August 2020 
500 |a Gesehen am 17.02.2021 
520 |a BackgroundThe prognostic effect of multi-component cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in the modern era of statins and acute revascularisation remains controversial. Focusing on actual clinical practice, the aim was to evaluate the effect of CR on total mortality and other clinical endpoints after an acute coronary event.DesignStructured review and meta-analysis.MethodsRandomised controlled trials (RCTs), retrospective controlled cohort studies (rCCSs) and prospective controlled cohort studies (pCCSs) evaluating patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or mixed populations with coronary artery disease (CAD) were included, provided the index event was in 1995 or later.ResultsOut of n?=?18,534 abstracts, 25 studies were identified for final evaluation (RCT: n?=?1; pCCS: n?=?7; rCCS: n?=?17), including n?=?219,702 patients (after ACS: n?=?46,338; after CABG: n?=?14,583; mixed populations: n?=?158,781; mean follow-up: 40 months). Heterogeneity in design, biometrical assessment of results and potential confounders was evident. CCSs evaluating ACS patients showed a significantly reduced mortality for CR participants (pCCS: hazard ratio (HR) 0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20?0.69; rCCS: HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49?0.84; odds ratio 0.20, 95% CI 0.08?0.48), but the single RCT fulfilling Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS) inclusion criteria showed neutral results. CR participation was also associated with reduced mortality after CABG (rCCS: HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.54?0.70) and in mixed CAD populations.ConclusionsCR participation after ACS and CABG is associated with reduced mortality even in the modern era of CAD treatment. However, the heterogeneity of study designs and CR programmes highlights the need for defining internationally accepted standards in CR delivery and scientific evaluation. 
650 4 |a acute coronary syndrome 
650 4 |a coronary artery disease 
650 4 |a coronary bypass grafting 
650 4 |a hospital readmission 
650 4 |a mortality 
650 4 |a Rehabilitation 
700 1 |a Saure, Daniel  |d 1986-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1016032161  |0 (DE-627)705475662  |0 (DE-576)351440666  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Jensen, Katrin  |d 1969-2020  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)118168061  |0 (DE-627)694729736  |0 (DE-576)291749240  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t European journal of preventive cardiology  |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2012  |g 23(2016), 18, Seite 1914-1939  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)683371673  |w (DE-600)2646239-4  |w (DE-576)357226569  |x 2047-4881  |7 nnas  |a The prognostic effect of cardiac rehabilitation in the era of acute revascularisation and statin therapy a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies - The Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS) 
773 1 8 |g volume:23  |g year:2016  |g number:18  |g pages:1914-1939  |g extent:26  |a The prognostic effect of cardiac rehabilitation in the era of acute revascularisation and statin therapy a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies - The Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS) 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487316671181  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
992 |a 20210126 
993 |a Article 
994 |a 2016 
998 |g 118168061  |a Jensen, Katrin  |m 118168061:Jensen, Katrin  |d 910000  |d 999701  |e 910000PJ118168061  |e 999701PJ118168061  |k 0/910000/  |k 1/910000/999701/  |p 8 
998 |g 1016032161  |a Saure, Daniel  |m 1016032161:Saure, Daniel  |p 4 
998 |g 121440060  |a Rauch, Bernhard  |m 121440060:Rauch, Bernhard  |d 50000  |e 50000PR121440060  |k 0/50000/  |p 1  |x j 
999 |a KXP-PPN1745630112  |e 3842390742 
BIB |a Y 
SER |a journal 
JSO |a {"name":{"displayForm":["Bernhard Rauch, Constantinos H. Davos, Patrick Doherty, Daniel Saure, Maria-Inti Metzendorf, Annett Salzwedel, Heinz Völler, Katrin Jensen and Jean-Paul Schmid; on behalf of the \"Cardiac Rehabilitation Section\", European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC), in cooperation with the Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics (IMBI), Department of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, and the Cochrane Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders Group, Institute of General Practice, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany"]},"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"2016","dateIssuedKey":"2016"}],"id":{"eki":["1745630112"],"doi":["10.1177/2047487316671181"]},"physDesc":[{"extent":"26 S."}],"relHost":[{"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"2012-","dateIssuedKey":"2012","publisher":"Oxford University Press ; Sage Publ.","publisherPlace":"Oxford ; London [u.a.]"}],"id":{"issn":["2047-4881"],"zdb":["2646239-4"],"eki":["683371673"]},"name":{"displayForm":["EAPC, European Association of Preventive Cardiology; ESC, European Society of Cardiology"]},"physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"title":[{"title":"European journal of preventive cardiology","title_sort":"European journal of preventive cardiology"}],"pubHistory":["19.2012 -"],"part":{"year":"2016","pages":"1914-1939","issue":"18","text":"23(2016), 18, Seite 1914-1939","volume":"23","extent":"26"},"titleAlt":[{"title":"Preventive cardiology"}],"disp":"The prognostic effect of cardiac rehabilitation in the era of acute revascularisation and statin therapy a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies - The Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS)European journal of preventive cardiology","type":{"bibl":"periodical","media":"Online-Ressource"},"note":["Gesehen am 10.02.2021"],"language":["eng"],"recId":"683371673"}],"person":[{"given":"Bernhard","family":"Rauch","role":"aut","display":"Rauch, Bernhard","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn"},{"given":"Daniel","family":"Saure","role":"aut","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","display":"Saure, Daniel"},{"given":"Katrin","family":"Jensen","role":"aut","display":"Jensen, Katrin","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn"}],"title":[{"title":"The prognostic effect of cardiac rehabilitation in the era of acute revascularisation and statin therapy","subtitle":"a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies - The Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS)","title_sort":"prognostic effect of cardiac rehabilitation in the era of acute revascularisation and statin therapy"}],"note":["Published: 29 August 2020","Gesehen am 17.02.2021"],"type":{"bibl":"article-journal","media":"Online-Ressource"},"language":["eng"],"recId":"1745630112"} 
SRT |a RAUCHBERNHPROGNOSTIC2016