Phrenic nerve stimulation in CRT patients and benefits of electronic lead repositioning: the ERACE trial

Despite novel left ventricular (LV) lead technologies, phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) remains an adverse effect observed in many patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Beyond anatomic repositioning, modern CRT devices allow avoidance of PNS also by software-based adaption of the pac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Götze, Stephan (VerfasserIn) , Defaye, Pascal (VerfasserIn) , Bauer, Alexander (VerfasserIn) , Merkel, Matthias (VerfasserIn) , Bizeau, Olivier (VerfasserIn) , Treusch, Sven (VerfasserIn) , Contzen, Klaus (VerfasserIn) , Jünger, Claus Heinrich (VerfasserIn) , Winter, Joachim (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 19 July 2013
In: Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology
Year: 2013, Jahrgang: 38, Pages: 1-9
ISSN:1572-8595
DOI:10.1007/s10840-013-9811-9
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-013-9811-9
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Stephan Goetze, Pascal Defaye, Alexander Bauer, Matthias Merkel, Olivier Bizeau, Sven Treusch, Klaus Contzen, Claus Juenger, Joachim Winter, on behalf of the ERACE study investigators
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Despite novel left ventricular (LV) lead technologies, phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) remains an adverse effect observed in many patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Beyond anatomic repositioning, modern CRT devices allow avoidance of PNS also by software-based adaption of the pacing configuration. The Electronic Repositioning With Acuity and Easytrak Leads study evaluated the incidence of PNS in a CRT population and examined how often LV lead relocation can be avoided by “electronic repositioning” (ER).
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 12.02.2020
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1572-8595
DOI:10.1007/s10840-013-9811-9