Reproducibility of peri-implant probing using a force-controlled probe
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reproducibility of probing depth (PD) and vertical attachment level (PAL-V) measurements at endosseous implants. Twenty partially edentulous patients who had received 44 Frialit-2 and 30 Astra implants between 1994 and 1996 were examined. At all teeth...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2001
|
| In: |
Clinical oral implants research
Year: 2001, Jahrgang: 12, Heft: 2, Pages: 153-158 |
| ISSN: | 1600-0501 |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002153.x |
| Online-Zugang: | Resolving-System, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002153.x Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002153.x |
| Verfasserangaben: | Peter Eickholz, Frank L. Grotkamp, Hans J. Staehle, Helmut Steveling, Joachim Mühling |
| Zusammenfassung: | The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reproducibility of probing depth (PD) and vertical attachment level (PAL-V) measurements at endosseous implants. Twenty partially edentulous patients who had received 44 Frialit-2 and 30 Astra implants between 1994 and 1996 were examined. At all teeth and implants, clinical parameters (GI, PlI, PD, PAL-V) were measured at 6 sites using the flexible plastic version of the universal explorer TPS probe. At the implants and at teeth that were in similar locations compared to the implants, PD and PAL-V measurements were repeated. For each of the 20 probes that had been used for clinical examination of the 20 patients, the probing force was assessed using a precision balance. As a measure of intraexaminer reproducibility, the following standard deviations of single PD and PAL-V measurements were calculated: Frialit-2: 0.71/0.74 mm; Astra: 0.72/0.75 mm; tooth: 0.59/0.57 mm (PD/PAL-V). Stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed implant/tooth position and GI to influence PD and PAL-V measurement error (P<0.001). At anterior teeth, a lower variability was observed than at posterior teeth (P<0.001). PD and PAL-V measurement error were higher at implants than at teeth and influenced by patients. The respective models explained 13% and 17% of the variability of the dependent variable (PD/PAL-V), respectively. Intraexaminer variability of PD and PAL-V measurements at implants tended to be higher than at teeth. Multivariate analysis of variance revealed probe and probe holder to statistically significantly (P<0.001) influence probing force. However, the differences in probing force between the various probe heads were very small. They reached a maximum of 0.054 N between probe 3 and 14 and may be looked upon as clinically irrelevant. |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | First published: 19 January 2002 Elektronische Reproduktion der Druck-Ausgabe Gesehen am 12.02.2021 |
| Beschreibung: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1600-0501 |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002153.x |