Wright on McKinsey one more time
In this essay, Crispin Wright’s various attempts at solving the so-called McKinsey paradox are reconstructed and criticized. In the first section, I argue against Anthony Brueckner that Wright’s solution does require that there is a failure of warrant transmission in McKinsey’s argument. To this end...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
[2021]
|
| In: |
Logos & Episteme
Year: 2021, Jahrgang: 12, Heft: 1, Pages: 101-116 |
| ISSN: | 2069-3052 |
| DOI: | 10.5840/logos-episteme20211215 |
| Online-Zugang: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme20211215 Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=logos-episteme&id=logos-episteme_2021_0012_0001_0101_0116 
|
| Verfasserangaben: | Simon Dierig |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1753241863 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220819155052.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210407s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.5840/logos-episteme20211215 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1753241863 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1753241863 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1341403587 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 10 |2 sdnb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Dierig, Simon |d 1971- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)124580971 |0 (DE-627)363423605 |0 (DE-576)186680120 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Wright on McKinsey one more time |c Simon Dierig |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2021] | |
| 300 | |a 16 | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Gesehen am 07.04.2021 | ||
| 520 | |a In this essay, Crispin Wright’s various attempts at solving the so-called McKinsey paradox are reconstructed and criticized. In the first section, I argue against Anthony Brueckner that Wright’s solution does require that there is a failure of warrant transmission in McKinsey’s argument. To this end, a variant of the McKinsey paradox for earned a priori warrant is reconstructed, and it is claimed that Wright’s putative solution of this paradox is best understood as drawing on the contention that there is a transmission failure in the argument in question. In section II, I focus on Wright’s views in the second part of his pivotal article on the McKinsey paradox (published in 2003). It is argued that the solution to the paradox proposed there by Wright is convincing if his theory of entitlements is accepted. In the third section, however, I raise an objection against Wright’s account of entitlements. Finally, in section IV, Wright’s views in his most recent essay on the McKinsey paradox are examined. It is shown that his new solution to this problem does not work any better than his earlier attempts at solving it. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Logos & Episteme |d Iași : Romanian Academy, Iasi Branch, "Gheorghe Zane" Institute for Economic and Social Research, 2010 |g 12(2021), 1, Seite 101-116 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)64730032X |w (DE-600)2594465-4 |w (DE-576)337891990 |x 2069-3052 |7 nnas |a Wright on McKinsey one more time |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |g pages:101-116 |g extent:16 |a Wright on McKinsey one more time |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme20211215 |x Verlag |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=logos-episteme&id=logos-episteme_2021_0012_0001_0101_0116 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 992 | |a 20210407 | ||
| 993 | |a Article | ||
| 994 | |a 2021 | ||
| 998 | |g 124580971 |a Dierig, Simon |m 124580971:Dierig, Simon |d 70000 |d 70100 |d 70000 |e 70000PD124580971 |e 70100PD124580971 |e 70000PD124580971 |k 0/70000/ |k 1/70000/70100/ |k 0/70000/ |p 1 |x j |y j | ||
| 999 | |a KXP-PPN1753241863 |e 3903040754 | ||
| BIB | |a Y | ||
| SER | |a journal | ||
| JSO | |a {"name":{"displayForm":["Simon Dierig"]},"id":{"doi":["10.5840/logos-episteme20211215"],"eki":["1753241863"]},"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"[2021]","dateIssuedKey":"2021"}],"relHost":[{"title":[{"subtitle":"an international journal of epistemology","title":"Logos & Episteme","title_sort":"Logos & Episteme"}],"language":["eng"],"recId":"64730032X","disp":"Wright on McKinsey one more timeLogos & Episteme","note":["Gesehen am 09.12.2020"],"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"periodical"},"titleAlt":[{"title":"Logos and Episteme"}],"part":{"year":"2021","issue":"1","pages":"101-116","volume":"12","text":"12(2021), 1, Seite 101-116","extent":"16"},"pubHistory":["1.2010 -"],"id":{"zdb":["2594465-4"],"eki":["64730032X"],"issn":["2069-3052"]},"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"2010-","publisher":"Romanian Academy, Iasi Branch, \"Gheorghe Zane\" Institute for Economic and Social Research","dateIssuedKey":"2010","publisherPlace":"Iași"}],"physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}]}],"physDesc":[{"extent":"16 S."}],"person":[{"family":"Dierig","given":"Simon","display":"Dierig, Simon","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","role":"aut"}],"title":[{"title":"Wright on McKinsey one more time","title_sort":"Wright on McKinsey one more time"}],"recId":"1753241863","language":["eng"],"type":{"media":"Online-Ressource","bibl":"article-journal"},"note":["Gesehen am 07.04.2021"]} | ||
| SRT | |a DIERIGSIMOWRIGHTONMC2021 | ||