Stateness and democracy: evidence from East Asia and cross-regional comparisons

The concluding chapter summarizes and synthesizes findings across the different country. This exercise reveals two key points regarding the state-democray nexus. First, stateness is neither a sufficient nor a necessary condition for democratic consolidation. Not only can newly democratising regimes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Croissant, Aurel (Author) , Hellmann, Olli (Author)
Format: Chapter/Article
Language:English
Published: 2020
In: Stateness and democracy in East Asia
Year: 2020, Pages: 233-262
DOI:10.1017/9781108862783.010
Online Access:Resolving-System, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108862783.010
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/stateness-and-democracy-in-east-asia/stateness-and-democracy-evidence-from-east-asia-and-crossregional-comparisons/4FEF9F64F49AED0F54E13F93BC3F17C5
Get full text
Author Notes:by Aurel Croissant, Olli Hellmann
Description
Summary:The concluding chapter summarizes and synthesizes findings across the different country. This exercise reveals two key points regarding the state-democray nexus. First, stateness is neither a sufficient nor a necessary condition for democratic consolidation. Not only can newly democratising regimes be subject to path-dependent effects but intervening variables - in particular, the organization of particularistic networks - also play a role. Second, democracy will only have a strengthening effect on stateness if all partial regimes are sufficiently consolidated. That is to say, defective democracies do not produce strong incentives for political elites to invest in state-building. These findings are placed in a comparative perspective with ‘third-wave’ democracies in other parts of the world, which shows that our causal mechanisms travel beyond East Asia.
Item Description:Gesehen am 22.04.2021
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISBN:9781108862783
DOI:10.1017/9781108862783.010